25.11.09

Jason Reitman: A Director Who Gives Business the Business (The New York Times)


EVEN though Jason Reitman’s last film, “Juno,” was nominated for a best picture Oscar and his forthcoming film, “Up in the Air,” is among the most buzzed about this year, you probably wouldn’t notice this bearded young man walking by you in an airport.

It would be a good place to look, though.

Mr. Reitman, a 32-year-old prone to hoodies and stocking caps, reeks normalcy in most ways but is something of an obsessive when it comes to airports. Although he has a young family and a home in Los Angeles, his directing career has made him a frequent flier with an exalted airline status. He can speak with impressive specificity about security, amenities and wait times at dozens of airports because he spends so much time living in them.

That intimate familiarity with the rhythms and aesthetics of modern air travel informs much of “Up in the Air,” which opens Friday in 12 cities in advance of a wide Christmas release. This Paramount film, written by Mr. Reitman and Sheldon Turner and based on the novel by Walter Kirn, tells the story of a man who spends much of his time aloft, toe touching only long enough to fire people on behalf of companies that are too cowardly to take care of their own nasty business. A pampered member of a winged elite, Ryan Bingham (George Clooney) finds everything he needs in his roll-on suitcase. A charming, rootless grim reaper, Ryan has little use for the human connections that complicate life and little in the way of empathy for the people he is relentlessly axing. Along the way he finds a female doppelgänger, played by Vera Farmiga, who makes his stays at airport hotels all the more accommodating.

But the hermetic pleasantness of his existence is threatened when a young efficiency expert at the home office comes up with a plan to fire people remotely, using video chat. Mr. Clooney’s character gradually awakens to the human consequences of his chosen path as professional downsizer. As in “Juno” and “Thank You for Smoking,” Mr. Reitman’s other feature-length films, the dialogue comes rapidly, and the movie delivers plenty of dark humor, but the backdrop of mass layoffs and empty desks gives it a somber resonance as well.

In the course of writing and making the film the recession took hold just as Mr. Reitman and his wife began having children, which got him thinking about the homes and families torn apart by layoffs. The film, with its idealized depiction of air travel that leads to brutal consequences, suggests that while we can now go almost anywhere in a heartbeat, where exactly are we headed?

When it comes time to talk about his movie, we meet quite naturally in an airport. As we walked through Terminal A at Newark Liberty International Airport (not one of his favorites, by the way) Mr. Reitman stopped at a gadget store and made the traveler’s feral scan of the shelves in search of power for his iPhone. Although he had been in 15 cities in two weeks, he had nowhere to go on this day but offered to meet at an airport because I had a flight, and he likes airports just fine. Loves them, in fact.

“I’m very at home here. Look, I get to see a plane take off over your shoulders every few minutes, which is always exciting for me,” he said, gesturing to the tarmac as we settle in to a booth at T.G.I. Friday’s. “It would be fine for me to sit down at the bar, approach anyone here and talk to them about stuff and learn about their lives. The rest of the world turns off, no one expects anything of you, and I talk to strangers, I learn about lives I would never otherwise know about.”

That may sound a bit affected, a postmodern accommodation of a peripatetic existence, but Mr. Reitman looks at home in the booth even though he grew up in and around Los Angeles as the son of the Hollywood director and producer Ivan Reitman, who is a producer on the film and whose company put up half of the $25 million budget.

“All the airports kind of feel and look the same now,” Mr. Reitman said, grabbing one of the small burgers in the middle of the table. “Some are more beautiful, some are less beautiful, but for the most part you’re going to find a Starbucks in every airport. You’re going to get your coffee and the USA Today or New York Times in every airport. All the things that you want are there, so you can land anywhere, and you feel at home. You’re given the sense that you’re everywhere, but you’re nowhere; that you are constantly with your community, yet you have no community. There’s kind of a terrific irony to that.”

It is a short metaphorical walk, Mr. Reitman suggests, from the temporary bonhomie of airports to the social networks proliferating through our wired society.

“Technology works the same way. Things like Facebook have made you feel as though you’re connected to everybody,” he said, indicating his iPhone. “You’ve got a thousand friends on Facebook, but you don’t actually talk to anybody. You’re not close to anybody.”

This lack of attachment, both physical and emotional, frees Mr. Clooney’s character and imprisons him at the same time. His chosen path of piling up the miles while missing connections with his fellow humans comes in for scrutiny when his boss in Omaha (played by Jason Bateman, who also starred in “Juno”) becomes impressed by a fresh-out-of-college innovator inhabited by Anna Kendrick. She officiously argues that it’s much more cost effective to ship the outplacement brochures to each location and ruin people’s life remotely. She is sent on the road with Mr. Clooney’s character to be schooled in the face-to-face process even as she argues for its obsolescence. With his black belt in both travel and dismissals — her newbie status at both is the source of high jinks — he teaches her never to check luggage and to tell the freshly disenfranchised, “Everything you need to know is in the brochure.”

That last piece of advice is, of course, a lie, something that becomes clear in the reaction shots of the people whose lives are being fundamentally altered. By the time the script was finished and shooting was being set, Mr. Reitman realized that job loss, merely a motif in the script, was something he had to come at more directly. He decided to hold an open casting call for the recently fired in St. Louis and Detroit. Kevin Pilla, a father of four from St. Louis, was cast after he received an untenable relocation offer from his employer, an electronics distribution company.

“It gave me a chance to relive the moment and say all of the things that I wanted to say at the time,” Mr. Pilla said. He did not move and now has a job, but it took 19 brutal months, a kind of rolling agony that is etched into the performances of the nonactors who are part of the film.

“The second they heard the language of firing, you could just see it,” Mr. Reitman said. “Their eyes would turn, their posture would change, their face would go sallow. One girl broke into hives. It just happened, and they would be in the moment.”

“Some people were angry; some people were really sad; some people just had questions, were looking for answers,” he continued. “The scariest thing, the saddest thing, it wasn’t that they didn’t have money. No one complained about that. The harder thing was, people said unanimously, across the board: ‘I don’t know what I’m supposed to do. I don’t know where I’m supposed to go from here. When I leave this interview, I get in my car, I don’t know where I need to be.’ That for me is a devastating idea, and the closest thing to what George’s character was going through.”

Mr. Reitman originally did not plan to turn Mr. Kirn’s novel into a movie; he had urged his father to buy the rights. But after several stalled attempts to develop it, Ivan Reitman turned to his son.

“Jason is always watching all the time and has a gift for dialogue as a writer and a director that is pretty rare,” the elder Mr. Reitman said. “And he has a moral compass about how people are treated that worked very well in this film.”

His son took Mr. Kirn’s idea of a man who lived in an airline seat — “I’m from here,” he says cheerfully to a query from a fellow passenger — and wrote several new story lines, including a romance of equals with Ms. Farmiga’s character. In a hotel lobby bar, naturally, they meet cute and begin comparing club cards and membership privileges until they casually hook up, which may be the ultimate amenity of travel. But Mr. Clooney’s character finds himself pining for something more from his fellow road warrior and takes her to the wedding of a family member. It looks as if a movie-magic hug is nigh, but that is not how Mr. Reitman works.

“Jason is not somebody who is going to give you the same old tidy ending,” Ms. Farmiga said. “And as an actor, it is much more surprising and invigorating to work on a film like this.”

Mr. Reitman’s ability to render imperfect people in watchable ways is not lost on fellow directors.

“This movie is funny and sad, a very personal kind of work that is not very common,” said Judd Apatow, the director and producer (“Knocked Up,” “Funny People”) who is a friend of Mr. Reitman. “It’s full of people who are not doing the right thing most of the time, and even though they are a mess, we find them human and relatable.”

In an e-mail message from Italy Mr. Clooney said that Mr. Reitman was one of the best directors he’s worked with, on the level of the Coen brothers or Steven Soderbergh. “And with each film he gets better,” he wrote. “He’s nice. He’s smart. He’s accomplished. I hate him.”

Despite his upbringing and his professional accolades, Mr. Reitman has little concern for status. (“Jason is the kind of guy who is happy to meet at the old taco stand around the corner from the fancy restaurant,” said Eric Steelberg, a high school friend and the director of photography on this film and “Juno.”)

Except when it comes to airline travel. He once flew from Los Angeles to Chicago to pick up a pizza and, not so coincidently, to maintain his status on United Airlines. I mention that the flight I’m about to take will earn me a gold card on Continental.

“I’m very proud of you,” he said, offering a fist bump, but he can’t resist a bit of comparison. “I’m at a level on United that is invite-only. It’s called Global Services.”

Yes, he’s from here.

Libros de cine en Google Books


Sculpting in Time, by Andrei Tarkovsky



What is Cinema?, by André Bazin


Dos clásicos, en el caso que no los hayan leído, o no los tengan...


"Me and Orson Welles", de Richard Linklater (The New York Times review)


Published: November 25, 2009

The action in “Me and Orson Welles” takes place in 1937 during a single hectic week bookended by two moments of relative tranquillity in which a boy (Zac Efron) meets a girl (Zoe Kazan). In the film’s final scene, as they stroll out of the New York Public Library, the girl, an aspiring writer, bubbles with enthusiasm about the world of music, art and literature that seems to be opening up all around them. So much is going on! So much to be part of!

Though specific in its period references — the musical choices in particular are fresh and precise — this movie is much more than an exercise in nostalgia for those storied old days, when Harold Ross edited The New Yorker, Orson Welles bestrode the boards of the Mercury Theater and Brooks Atkinson reviewed plays for The New York Times.

Instead, “Me and Orson Welles,” directed by Richard Linklater, with a screenplay (from Robert Kaplow’s novel) by Holly Gent Palmo and Vince Palmo, pays tribute to youthful creative ambition where and whenever it may thrive. The story of a teenager’s sometimes uncomfortable brush with greatness, it is necessary viewing for anyone whose imagination has been seduced by the charms of art.

Which can be a painful, disillusioning experience as well as a source of exhilaration. This, at any rate, is what Richard, Mr. Efron’s character, discovers when he stumbles into the Mercury’s production of Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar,” directed by a bombastic young fellow who lends his name to the film’s title and to so much else besides. “War of the Worlds” and “Citizen Kane” are still in the future, as are the triumphs and brutal disappointments of Welles’s postwar career, but the ego and the brilliance are in full blossom.

They are captured, with a brio and wit that puts most biopic mummery to shame, by Christian McKay, a British actor with a slender résumé and superhuman confidence. His evident relish in the dimensions of this role is a crucial part of the performance. It’s so much fun to play Orson Welles because it must have been at least as much fun to be Orson Welles.

Though perhaps not to work with him. “Me and Orson Welles” spends most of its time backstage at the Mercury, as the cast and crew struggle and stumble toward opening night, alternately buoyed and sandbagged by their resident genius, who is not shy about reminding the company members that they are servants to his vision. He showers them with hyperbolic praise — seeing “images of magnificence” in every actor’s eyes — and then crushes them with brutal criticism.

His loyal partner, John Houseman (Eddie Marsan), endures it all with amused resignation. The others humor Welles, complain about him, try to compete with him or go to bed with him. They are supporting players in the grand drama of his personality. The only peer he might recognize on the set of “Julius Caesar” is Shakespeare himself.

In that production Welles played Brutus — a complicated character, both noble and treacherous. And “Me and Orson Welles” shows him in similarly shaded light, illuminating both his talent and his caddishness. Best of all, the movie allows us to glimpse enough of the rehearsal and performance to see just why the Mercury “Caesar” was a milestone in the history of the modern theater.

Art is glorious. The making of art less so. Richard, cast almost by accident in a minor role, learns some hard lessons about the ways of show folk, for whom sincerity is a higher form of pretending. He befriends Joseph Cotten (James Tupper), marvels at George Coulouris (Ben Chaplin), the high-strung British actor playing Mark Antony, and falls in love with Sonja (Claire Danes), who manages the Mercury and dreams of meeting David O. Selznick.

Sonja is both ingénue and woman of the world, at once a servant of the muse and a calculating careerist, and Ms. Danes is nimble, likable and smart — words that describe the movie itself. While Mr. Efron may not conjure images of magnificence, he does well as the audience’s surrogate, an eager and affable adventurer in the enchanted realm of the theater.

Disenchantment is part of the magic, and “Me and Orson Welles” strikes a persuasive balance between naïveté and cynicism, both of which are necessary to the theatrical enterprise. Art is a fairy tale we choose to believe in, and this movie, a fiction confected about real people, is too good not to be true.

“Me and Orson Welles” is rated PG-13 (Parents strongly cautioned). It has some profanity and adult situations.

ME AND ORSON WELLES

Opens on Wednesday in New York and Los Angeles.

Directed by Richard Linklater; written by Holly Gent Palmo and Vince Palmo, based on the novel by Robert Kaplow; director of photography, Dick Pope; edited by Sandra Adair; production designer, Laurence Dorman; produced by Mr. Linklater, Marc Samuelson and Ann Carli; released by CinemaNX and Detour Filmproduction. Running time: 1 hour 53 minutes.

WITH: Zac Efron (Richard Samuels/Lucius), Claire Danes (Sonja Jones), Christian McKay (Orson Welles/Brutus), Ben Chaplin (George Coulouris/Mark Antony), Zoe Kazan (Gretta Adler), Eddie Marsan (John Houseman), Kelly Reilly (Muriel Brassler/Portia) and James Tupper (Joseph Cotten/Publius).

"The Lovely Bones", de Peter Jackson (críticas)


(U.S.-U.K.) A Paramount release (in U.S.) of a DreamWorks Pictures presentation in association with Film4 of a Wingnut Films production. Produced by Carolynne Cunningham, Fran Walsh, Peter Jackson, Aimee Peyronnet. Executive producers, Tessa Ross, Steven Spielberg, Ken Kamins, James Wilson. Co-producers, Philippa Boyens, Anne Bruning, Marc Ashton. Directed by Peter Jackson. Screenplay, Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens, Peter Jackson, based on the novel by Alice Sebold.

Jack Salmon - Mark Wahlberg
Abigail Salmon - Rachel Weisz
Grandma Lynn - Susan Sarandon
George Harvey - Stanley Tucci
Len Fenerman - Michael Imperioli
Susie Salmon - Saoirse Ronan
Lindsey Salmon - Rose McIver
Buckley Salmon - Christian Ashdale
Ray Singh - Reece Ritchie
Peter Jackson's infatuation with fancy visual effects mortally wounds "The Lovely Bones." Alice Sebold's cheerily melancholy bestseller, centered upon a 14-year-old girl who narrates the story from heaven after having been brutally murdered, provides almost ready-made bigscreen material. But Jackson undermines solid work from a good cast with show-offy celestial evocations that severely disrupt the emotional connections with the characters. The book's rep, the names of Jackson and exec producer Steven Spielberg, and a mighty year-end push by Paramount/DreamWorks will likely put this over with the public to a substantial extent, but it still rates as a significant artistic disappointment.

There has been cautious optimism among longtime Jackson followers that this material might inspire him to create a worthy companion piece to his 1994 "Heavenly Creatures," which similarly involves teenagers and murder in an otherwise tranquil setting and remains far and away his best film. The potential was certainly there in the book, which reminds of Dennis Lehane's successfully filmed novels "Mystic River" and "Gone Baby Gone" in its devastating emotional trauma, but offers the distinctive perspective of the most entirely plausible omniscient narrator in modern literature.

Unfortunately, the massive success Jackson has enjoyed in the intervening years with his CGI-heavy "The Lord of the Rings" saga (the source of which receives fleeting homage in a bookstore scene here) and "King Kong" has infected the way he approaches this far more intimate tale. Instead of having the late Susie Salmon occupy a little perch in an abstract heavenly gazebo from which she can peer down upon her family and anyone else -- all that is really necessary from a narrative point of view -- the director has indulged his whims to create constantly shifting backdrops depicting an afterlife evocative of "The Sound of Music" or "The Wizard of Oz" one moment, "The Little Prince" or "Teletubbies" the next.

It's a shame, because the first half-hour or so suggests that Jackson, had he taken a vow to keep it real and use not a single visual effect, still has it in him to relate a human story in a direct, vibrant manner. Aided immeasurably by the spirited teen actress Saoirse Ronan ("Atonement"), who plays Susie, the early scenes depicting the ordinary life of the Salmon family in a midsized Pennsylvania town possess a heightened quality charged by lively thesping and Andrew Lesnie's dynamic mobile camera (pic was shot with the Red digital camera system).

"We weren't those people, those unlucky people to whom bad things happen," Susie intones from above, as we watch her interact with attractive young parents Jack and Abigail (Mark Wahlberg, Rachel Weisz), sporty sister Lindsey (Rose McIver) and younger brother Buckley (Christian Ashdale), boozy glamorpuss grandma Lynn (Susan Sarandon) and handsome first crush Ray Singh (Reece Ritchie), just before she announces she was murdered on Dec. 6, 1973.

Even before the deed is done, it's plainly stated that the perpetrator is neighborhood solitary guy George Harvey (Stanley Tucci), a man marked as creepy by his utter ordinariness. While Tucci, adorned with stringy blondish-brown hair, moustache, large glasses and a raspy voice that tightens and elevates under pressure, is good enough to validate all the scenes involving this bland monster, Jackson shows his low-budget horror-film roots in the way he shoots the sinister scenes, with silhouetting white lights, heavy fog effects, wide-angle closeups and generic synth backgrounding from Brian Eno's otherwise effective score.

While the script by the "Rings" trio of Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens and Jackson at first inventively reshuffles elements to cinematic advantage, over time it serves more to dilute the impact of some story elements -- the father's obsessive determination to nail George no matter what, Lindsay's romance, the passage of years -- and eliminate others, including Ray's beautiful, long-suffering mother and the relationship between Abigail and local cop Len Fenerman (Michael Imperioli), whose efforts to solve Susie's murder are maddeningly frustrated.

Once Susie is installed in her heavenly quarters, for which Jackson digitally dedicates himself to continuously changing the wallpaper, the emotional link to the family is ruptured and never fully repaired. There are intermittently intense scenes: Lindsey proves herself a resourceful if somewhat reckless spy, and the ever-meticulous George almost blows his cover on occasion. The way Jackson only partially reveals the killer's face at times is effective but stands in stark contrast to the wobbly treatment of so much else.

As the story progresses -- in a way that points to resolution in one sense and a simple petering out in another -- it becomes clear that the actors are being deprived of any meaty, well-developed scenes to play; we learn more about them early on than toward the end, making this a film of slowly diminishing returns.

With reddish hair, brilliantly alive eyes and a seemingly irrepressible impulse for movement and activity, Ronan represents a heavenly creature indeed, a figure of surging, eager, anticipatory life cut off just as it is budding. Less quicksilver and more solidly built, McIver's Lindsey properly begins in her live-wire sister's shadow only to grow gradually into an impressive figure. Chain-smoking and depleting the liquor cabinet, Sarandon camps it up for a few welcome laughs, while Ritchie seems a likely candidate for teen idolhood.

Mainly, it's Wahlberg and Weisz who are shortchanged by the film's divided attention between earthly agony and astral accommodation. Both thesps are OK as far as things go, but that's not nearly far enough.

When it sticks to the everyday neighborhood inhabited by its characters, "The Lovely Bones," which was shot on Pennsylvania locations and in New Zealand studios, finds a reasonable equilibrium between drama and production values. When it ventures beyond it, heaven turns into Hades. With: Carolyn Dando, Nikki Soohoo, Andrew James Allen, Jake Abel, AJ Michalka, Tom McCarthy, Stink Fisher.

Camera (Deluxe color, widescreen, DV), Andrew Lesnie; editor, Jabez Olssen; music, Brian Eno; production designer, Naomi Shohan; art directors, Chris Shriver, Jules Cook; set designers, Philip Thomas, Darryl Longstaffe, Barry Read, Christina Crawford, Miriam Barrard; set decorators, George DeTitta Jr., Meg Everist; costume designer, Nancy Steiner; sound (Dolby Digital/DTS/SDDS), Hammond Peek; supervising sound editors, Brent Burge, Chris Ward; sound designers, Dave Whitehead, Christopher Boyes; re-recording mixers, Boyes, Michael Semanick, Michael Hedges; senior visual effects supervisor, Joe Letteri; visual effects supervisor, Christian Rivers; digital visual effects, Weta Digital; stunt coordinator, Peter Bucossi; assistant director, Carolynne Cunningham; second unit director, Richard Bluck; casting, Victoria Burrows, Scot R. Boland, Avy Kaufman, Jina Jay, Liz Mullane. Reviewed at the Landmark, Los Angeles, Nov. 18, 2009. MPAA Rating: PG-13. Running time: 136 MIN.

-------------------------------------------------

Wendy Ide (Times of London)

In many ways Alice Sebold’s massively successful metaphysical coming-of-age drama was an unexpected choice of movie for Peter Jackson. After the vast undertaking of The Lord Of the Rings trilogy, followed by the exuberant, overgrown B-movie that was King Kong, this sentimental tale of a murdered teenager called Susie Salmon watching her grieving family from a personal afterlife seems intimate by comparison.

It seemed likely to be closer in tone to the claustrophobic femininity of 1994’s Heavenly Creatures than to the massive event movies for which he later became known. But Jackson’s predilection for richly textured layers of fantasy runs riot here and the approach is anything but understated. “Small-scale” no longer appears in Peter Jackson’s filmmaking lexicon.

The Lovely Bones, which was given its premiere last night at the Royal Film Performance in the presence of the Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall, is a domestic tragedy that unfolds under a mushroom cloud of flamboyantly kitsch special effects. Susie Salmon (Saoirse Ronan) spends most of the film observing events from her personal purgatory, the “in-between”. It looks like a teen magazine photo story styled by Salvador Dali and directed by Tarsem Singh. This twinkly butterflies-and-rainbows aesthetic invites inevitable and unwelcome comparisons to Vincent Ward’s 1998 mawkish afterlife weepie What Dreams May Come and, worse still, Darren Aronofsky’s New Age clunker The Fountain. Far more interesting is the design of the real world. The small-town suburbia of the 1970s is imbued with a slightly oppressive otherness — it’s as much an “in-between” as the place that Susie now inhabits.

The production, by all accounts, was not entirely easy, not least because the actor Ryan Gosling, who had gained 20lb and grown a beard for the role of Susie’s father Jack Salmon, quit the film over creative differences just days before the shoot started. Mark Wahlberg stepped in to replace him, turning in a couple of powerful scenes in a mostly workmanlike performance.

Rachel Weisz is effective as the mother hollowed out by her grief; but Susan Sarandon’s boozy, chain-smoking grandmother feels too much like a contrived piece of light relief to temporarily distract us from the violent death of a 14-year-old child.

It’s Ronan, ultimately, who gives the most affecting turn. Gangly, unformed, she’s like a flower cut before it has had a chance to bloom. She captures the uncertainty and intensity of thwarted teenage passions perfectly but, set against the artifice and the manipulative tendencies of the story, her admirable performance is rather swamped.

------------------------------------------------------

From Time Out London

Let nobody say that Peter Jackson doesn’t like a challenge. After filming Tolkien’s three ‘The Lord of the Rings’ books and spending over $200 million on a new three-hour version of ‘King Kong’, the New Zealand director who started out making splatter horror in the late 1980s has turned to Alice Sebold’s hugely popular ‘The Lovely Bones’, the 1970s-set American novel narrated from beyond the grave by Susie Salmon (Saoirse Ronan), a 14-year-old who is raped and murdered by a neighbour in a field near her suburban home . From a vantage point somewhere between heaven and earth, Susie follows the reactions and behaviour of her parents (Mark Wahlberg, Rachel Weisz), her sister (Rose McIver) and her killer, Mr Harvey (Stanley Tucci), as she struggles to gain the closure that will allow her to depart this earth completely.

Not that we see anyone raped or even murdered in this $100 million, 12A version of the story: Jackson softens the edges of both the initial tragedy and its fallout among Susie’s family. But that’s not the main fault of the film. The real let-down is its heavy reliance on overblown special-effects sequences to represent the celestial limbo where Susie resides immediately after death. Coming across like Salvador Dali was commissioned to represent Middle Earth for the New Zealand tourist board, these scenes dominate the film to such an extent that you begin to doubt that Jackson has much concern for the real family disaster at the film’s heart. Wahlberg, Weisz and McIver are all sidelined in favour of the magic of the animator’s hard drive. It doesn’t help that a gin-swigging Susan Sarandon is called on to play Susie’s louche grandmother for inappropriate comic effect just when you feel the film could do with a touch more tragic weight.

However, these are mere niggles compared to the film’s fatal flaw: perspective. Who’s telling us this story? The answer, of course, should be Susie Salmon, and at points, we hear some of the book’s first-person narration as voiceover, including the well-known opening – ‘My name was Salmon, like the fish; first name, Susie. I was fourteen when I was murdered on December 6, 1973 – which graces the film’s opening and close . But there’s no consistency to Susie’s presence as the prism through which we see her story. Certainly the chocolate-box look of this American suburban world, which barely ever feels real, suggests that it’s a 14-year-old girl’s view of life. Yet there are whole sections of the movie when we forget Susie’s all-seeing eye and don’t know whether we’re in a family drama, a crime thriller or a horror. There are distracting hints of all three, without any of them taking hold and defining the tone of the film.

There are good points. Saoirse Ronan is a compelling presence as Susie Salmon, especially as she must have been acting alone and against a green screen for much of the shoot, and both her and the film are strong at capturing her burgeoning attraction to her schoolmate Ray (Reece Ritchie), a hint of adult sexuality cut short by tragedy. Stanley Tucci is creepy as Mr Harvey (even if he resembles a million movie paedophiles), and Jackson is at his best as a director when creating a sense of dread around Harvey whenever he’s anywhere near Susie or, later, her sister. Yet there’s no escaping the digital glare of Susie’s half-dead existence – a glare that threatens to blind us to anything remotely human in this drama.

Author: Dave Calhoun


Rohfilms enters 'Mysterious World' - Rizoma produces Moreno black comedy


BUENOS AIRES -- Argentina’s Rizoma Films, producer of commercial and fest hits like “Who Says It’s Easy” and “Gigante,” has inked with Germany’s Rohfilms to make the next pic from Rodrigo Moreno, helmer of “El custodio” (The Custodian).

“A Mysterious World” is set to start lensing on Dec. 7, with a E400,000 ($603,000) budget.

It is Moreno’s follow-up to “The Custodian,” which won the 2006 Berlinale’s Alfred Bauer award.

“Mysterious World” is a dark comedy about a guy who buys a car after his wife asks for a separation and finds out his life is rather empty.

Rizoma topper Hernan Musaluppi aims to keep below-the-line costs to a minimum so that more of the budget goes on the screen.

“It is an amateur film done by professionals,” Musaluppi told Variety. “I don’t want to pay for things that are not seen on the screen.”

Musaluppi will participate in Ventana Sur, a new four-day Latin American film market that starts this Friday in Buenos Aires.

Rizoma is also preparing for a 2010 shoot of “Insoladas,” Gustavo Taretto’s second feature.

Comedy is about five girls sunbathing on a rooftop and dreaming of going to Cuba, a metaphor for the difficulty of fulfilling dreams.

Taretto’s freshman effort, “Medianeras” (Sidewalls), is in post under Rizoma, Germany’s Pandora Films and Spain’s Morena Films, with a budget of about $1.1 million and a release set for the second-half of next year.

Toplining Pilar Lopez de Ayala, Javier Drolas and Ines Efron, “Sidewalls” is a comedy about a man and a woman looking for love and always crossing paths, exposing the loneliness of the big city.

Anima to co-produce CGI pic 'Gaturro' (Variety)


BUENOS AIRES -- Mexico’s Anima Estudios has inked to co-produce animated feature “Gaturro,” which is lead produced by Argentina’s Illusion Studios and Toonz Animation India.

Anima will take minority equity in “Gaturro,” about a cat TV star, and carry out post-production.

Anima’s boarding of “Gaturro” advances a three CGI pic co-production alliance between Illusion and Anima, Latin America’s foremost film/TV toon producers.

In production, “Gaturro” will bow theatrically in Argentina and India second half 2010. Pic will also have a digital 3-D version.

Anima and Illusion are now studying a second toon feature.

“’Gaturro’ is the first step in a high-potential alliance,” Gaston Cami, Illusion VP international sales and co-productions, said Wednesday during the first day of Buenos Aires’ Expotoons animation fest. Another Illusion toon movie, “Boogie el aceitoso,” a crime drama satire, screens in Competition at Expotoons.

“The Latin American market is highly appealing for potential European partners,” Cami said.

“Our co-production agreement with Illusion Studios reinforces our strategy of an ever-growing production slate based on international world-class quality co-productions as well as the maturity and expansion of the Latin American animation industry,” Anima prexy Fernando De Fuentes said.

At Expotoons, Illusion also announced that it is has inked with BKN Kids to co-produce the 40-seg animated series “Joshua Blake” for the U.K. and Spain.

Illusion will carry out animation on the skein.

Expotoons runs Nov. 25-28.

"La mujer sin cabeza", de Lucrecia Martel, en la Cinemateca de Toronto


Swiss court grants bail to Polanski (Variety)


A Swiss court has approved Roman Polanski's bail offer of $4.5 million to be released from prison and kept under house arrest and electronic monitoring at his Swiss chalet.

But the Swiss Justice Ministry says it will keep Polanski in jail until it decides whether to appeal his release to the country's supreme court.

Spokesman Folco Galli says the ministry will make its decision "quickly," even though it has 10 days to appeal.

The Swiss Criminal Court still considers Polanski a high flight risk. Its ruling Wednesday said the new bail offer was significant enough to offset those concerns.

The decision does not affect the Swiss government's ongoing assessment of whether it should extradite Polanski to the U.S. for having sex in 1977 with a 13-year-old girl.


24.11.09

"The Road", de John Hillcoat (The New York Times)


Published: November 25, 2009

Bang or whimper? Fire or ice? Happily, holiday moviegoers interested in pondering the end of the world can select scenarios far more elaborate than those simple, traditional choices.

You can endure the noise and spectacle of Roland Emmerich’s “2012,” with its Mayan prophecies and mischievous neutrinos, or, if you are in a more stoic frame of mind, you can submit to the drizzle and grayness of “The Road,” adapted by the director John Hillcoat and the writer Joe Penhall from Cormac McCarthy’s austere and chilling fable of post-apocalyptic father-son bonding.

These two films — the cheesy action blockbuster and the earnest, literary Oscar aspirant — converge on a serious, anxious question. In the wake of a planetary catastrophe, how will humanity survive? Not the species itself, but rather the repertory of behaviors and impulses that we like to think separate us from other animals.

The unnamed father in “The Road” comforts his boy by telling him that the two of them are “carrying the fire.” A similar image is conjured near the end of “No Country for Old Men,” the Coen brothers’ movie based on another book by Mr. McCarthy, and in both cases it suggests the fragile decency that a righteous minority must protect from the forces of chaos and evil. The odds are not terrific, and whether their hope is a matter of hardy faith or persistent delusion is an open question.

The father and son, played by Viggo Mortensen and a wonderfully sensitive young actor named Kodi Smit-McPhee, drift through a world ruined by an unspecified cataclysm. A few flashbacks of ease and sunlight conjure the time before, when there was a mother on the scene, glowingly incarnated by Charlize Theron. Then something happened — Nuclear war? Environmental disaster? — that left a lot of people dead, threw the mother into despair and gutted the civilization those of us in the comfort of the multiplex take for granted.

The most arresting aspect of “The Road” is just how fully the filmmakers have realized this bleak, blighted landscape of a modern society reduced to savagery. A grimy, damp fog hangs over everything, and instead of birdsong there is the eerie creak and crash of falling trees. Vehicles sit abandoned on highways, houses stand looted and vacant, and what used to be towns are afterimages of violence and wreckage.

The only thing scarier than the empty, depopulated roads is the possibility of seeing people on them, who are more likely to be predators than possible companions. (However, since this is Cormac McCarthy country, we do meet an ancient, nearly blind man who speaks in riddles and is played by Robert Duvall.) The panic that must have attended the early days of destruction has long since given way, for the father and son, to weary anxiety and, in the boy’s case, constant fear. This is normal life: desperate scavenging punctuated by bouts of acute danger and occasional spasms of good luck.

They are not the only human beings left, but the father has divided the remnant into good guys and bad guys. In the second category are roving gangs of cannibals who evoke the flesh-eating zombies in a horror movie. And “The Road,” at its lean and suspenseful best, partakes of some of the grisly thrills and allegorical opportunities of that genre.

Mr. Mortensen, looking haggard and haunted, pushes it toward realism. A surpassingly quiet and thoughtful actor, he specializes in making improbable characters — a Middle Earth warrior in “Lord of the Rings,” a Russian mobster in “Eastern Promises,” a small-town dad with a secret in “A History of Violence” — seem like natural extensions of his own personality. In Mr. McCarthy’s skeletal, purple-tinted prose, the father is less a cipher than an axiom, an embodiment of flinty paternal steadfastness partly humanized by doubts and flaws. Mr. Mortensen puts flesh on the bones and a soul behind the exhausted, terrified eyes.

But “The Road,” though frequently powerful, and animated by a genuinely troubling premise, is hampered by compromises and half-measures. These have less to do with changes made to the story — Mr. Penhall’s script follows the novel as faithfully as a hunting dog — than with shifts in emphasis and tone. The intermittently fake-folky orchestral score by Nick Cave and Warren Ellis is musically inoffensive, but the way it is used softens crucial scenes and turns the sublime into the sentimental.

It may seem perverse to complain that a vision of human near-extinction is insufficiently bleak. After all, even Mr. McCarthy’s book offers a few hints of consolation. But for these to mean anything, the full horror of the situation has to be grasped, and despair has to be given its due. The film is reluctant to go that far, and, like Mr. Mortensen’s character, offers a reassurance that can feel a bit dishonest. The difference is that the father is fighting not to lose his son, while the filmmakers are striving not to lose an audience.

And, for the most part, they succeed. “The Road” is engrossing and at times impressive, a pretty good movie that is disappointing to the extent that it could have been great. Is this the way the world ends? With polite applause?

“The Road” is rated R (Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian). It has grisly violence and a pervasive mood of terror.

Thai film tops TIFF list of decade's best (CBC)


A Thai arthouse film is the most respected movie of the decade, according to a poll of film curators, historians and festival programmers.

A survey of film curators, historians, and festival programmers has chosen a Thai art-house movie to top the list of the decade's most respected films.

Syndromes and a Century by Apichatpong Weerasethakul heads the tally of more than 50 films chosen as the best of the 2000s by TIFF Cinematheque, the year-round screening program of the Toronto International Film Festival.

The film about a husband and wife working as doctors in rural Thailand has two stories set 50 years apart and is an examination of memory and the desire to become better people.

Two films by Chinese director Jia Zhang-ke took the second and third spots on the list ? Platform and Still Life.

The list includes works by Agnes Varda, Ingmar Bergman, Jean-Luc Godard, Pedro Almodóvar, Gus Van Sant and David Lynch.

Canadian filmmakers on the list include David Cronenberg for A History of Violence, Guy Maddin for The Heart of the World and My Winnipeg, and Zacharias Kunuk for Atanarjuat: The Fast Runner.

The list has 21 films from France, nine from the U.S., seven from Germany, six from Taiwan, and four each from Japan, China and Italy. Canada had three, as the Cronenberg film was categorized as an American production.

The rankings are based on a poll of more than 60 film experts around the world, with films that got equal votes sharing a ranking.

The list:

  1. Syndromes and a Century (Apichatpong Weerasethakul, Thailand).
  2. Platform (Jia Zhang-ke, Hong Kong, China/China/Japan/France)
  3. Still Life (Jia Zhang-ke, China).
  4. Beau travail (Claire Denis, France).
  5. In the Mood for Love (Wong Kar-wai, Hong Kong, China),
  6. Tropical Malady (Apichatpong Weerasethakul, France/Thailand/Germany/Italy).
  7. The Death of Mr. Lazarescu (Cristi Puiu, Romania); Werckmeister Harmonies (Béla Tarr, Hungary).
  8. Éloge de l'amour (Jean-Luc Godard, Switzerland/ France).
  9. 4 Months, 3 Weeks, 2 Days (Cristian Mungiu, Romania).
  10. Silent Light (Carlos Reygadas, Mexico/France/Netherlands).
  11. Russian Ark (Alexander Sokurov, Russia/Germany).
  12. The New World (Terrence Malick, U.S.)
  13. Blissfully Yours (Apichatpong Weerasethakul, France/Thailand).
  14. Le Fils (Jean-Pierre Dardenne, Luc Dardenne, Belgium/France).
  15. Colossal Youth (Pedro Costa, Portugal/France/Switzerland).
  16. Les Glaneurs et la glaneuse (Agnès Varda, France); In Vanda's Room (Pedro Costa, Portugal/Germany/Italy/Switzerland); Songs from the Second Floor (Roy Andersson, Sweden/Denmark/Norway).
  17. Caché (Michael Haneke, France/Austria/Germany/Italy); A History of Violence (David Cronenberg, classified as a U.S. film despite the director's Canadian nationality.); Mulholland Drive (David Lynch, France/USA); Three Times (Hou Hsiao-hsien, Taiwan).
  18. Rois et reine (Arnaud Desplechin, France).
  19. Elephant (Gus Van Sant, U.S.)
  20. Talk to Her (Pedro Almodóvar, Spain).
  21. The Wind Will Carry Us (Abbas Kiarostami, Iran/France); Yi Yi (A One and a Two) (Edward Yang, Taiwan/Japan).
  22. Pan's Labyrinth (Guillermo del Toro, Spain).
  23. L'Enfant (Jean-Pierre Dardenne, Luc Dardenne, Belgium/France); The Heart of the WorldDon't Want to Sleep Alone (Tsai Ming-liang, Taiwan/France/Austria); Star Spangled to Death (Ken Jacobs, U.S.) (Guy Maddin, Canada); I
  24. The World (Jia Zhang-ke, China/Japan/France).
  25. Café Lumière (Hou Hsiao-hsien, Japan); The Headless Woman (Lucrecia Martel, Argentina/Spain/France/Italy); L'Intrus (Claire Denis, France); Millennium Mambo (Hou Hsiao-hsien, Taiwan/France); My Winnipeg (Guy Maddin, Canada); Saraband (Ingmar Bergman, Sweden); Spirited Away (Hiyao Miyazaki, Japan); I'm Not There (Todd Haynes, U.S.)
  26. Gerry (Gus Van Sant, U.S.).
  27. Distant (Nuri Bilge Ceylan, Turkey); Dogville (Lars von Trier, Denmark/Sweden/UK/France/Germany); The Royal Tenenbaums (Wes Anderson, U.S.);
  28. Alexandra (Alexander Sokurov, Russia/France); Demonlover (Olivier Assayas, France).
  29. Atanarjuat, The Fast Runner (Zacharias Kunuk, Canada); Goodbye, Dragon Inn (Tsai Ming-liang, Taiwan).
  30. Longing (Valeska Grisebach, Germany); Secret Sunshine (Lee Chang-dong, South Korea); Vai e Vem (João César Monteiro, Portugal); Far From Heaven (Todd Haynes, U.S./France)

"Greenberg", de Noah Baumbach (trailer)

23.11.09

Citizen Welles as Myth in the Making (The New York Times)


By DENNIS LIM

RICHARD LINKLATER is keen to point out that his new film, “Me and Orson Welles,” is not a biopic. For starters, he said in a recent phone interview: “Biopics are the lamest genre. No one should attempt them anymore.”

What’s more, when it comes to a figure as protean and elusive as Welles, there are obvious complicating factors. Welles was not only a habitual fabulist — “the most unreliable narrator of his own life,” Mr. Linklater said — but also an outsize subject for the projections of others. (“I drag my myth around with me,” he told Kenneth Tynan.) His early masterpiece, “Citizen Kane” (1941), which for many came to define and haunt him, is a fittingly prismatic take on the perils of biography, one that leads its reporter character to conclude, “I don’t think any word can explain a man’s life.”

Based on a young-adult novel by Robert Kaplow, “Me and Orson Welles,” which opens on Wednesday, attempts nothing so lofty as an explanation of a life. It restricts itself to a few days in the garrulous company of a 22-year-old Welles, already a theater and radio star, a force of nature at the height of his productivity.

The year is 1937, and Welles (played by Christian McKay, a British stage actor with only one previous film credit) is fresh off his triumphant all-black staging of “Macbeth” and a few months shy of appearing on the cover of Time magazine. The wide-eyed perspective comes from the fictional “me” of the title, a teenage theater buff (Zac Efron) who stumbles into a bit part in the modern-dress version of “Julius Caesar” staged by the Mercury Theater, founded by Welles and John Houseman.

“His myth was still in creation,” Mr. Linklater said of the heady period covered in “Me and Orson Welles.” “You can see whatever you want there. You can see all the genius, or you can see future tragedy.” He acknowledged that any portrayal of Welles is bound to be something of a lightning rod. Because so many film lovers have “a special relationship with Welles,” he said, “to depict him is to risk interfering with their preconceptions or theories.”

The “battle over Orson Welles,” to use the phrase of the critic Jonathan Rosenbaum, has been raging since before Welles’s death in 1985, in a series of biographies and critical studies that range from apologias to hatchet jobs (with a greater number landing toward the negative end of the spectrum).

In grappling with an artist who revolutionized every medium he worked in but spent his final decades as a Hollywood outcast and a pop-culture punch line, Welles’s biographers — Barbara Leaming, David Thomson and Simon Callow, to name just a few — differ on whether he was a radical genius who fell victim to a callous and conservative system or a self-destructive failure who squandered his abundant gifts. In the critical arena Pauline Kael’s 1971 New Yorker polemic “Raising Kane,” which positioned the screenwriter Herman J. Mankiewicz as the main creative force behind “Citizen Kane,” prompted impassioned rebuttals from, among others, Mr. Rosenbaum, Joseph McBride and Peter Bogdanovich.

Aspects of Welles’s life and art are still coming to light — no surprise given the amount of unfinished business. There is a growing body of research on his incomplete work, like the Brazilian epic “It’s All True” and “Don Quixote,” a lifelong obsession. His oldest daughter, Chris Welles Feder, has just published a memoir, “In My Father’s Shadow,” which movingly recounts her relationship with a frequently absent father. Kimberly Reed’s recent “Prodigal Sons” is a dysfunctional-family documentary with one stranger-than-fiction twist: Ms. Reed’s unstable adopted brother learns that he is the grandson of Welles and Rita Hayworth.

Public perception of Welles, Mr. Linklater noted, is not the same around the world. In the United States, where the specter of those ’70s wine commercials remains, “there’s a tragic, underachieving quality to Welles,” he said. But in Europe “they count five, six, seven masterpieces and the theater work and they go, cultural icon, incredible career. Americans are asking why there isn’t more.”

While the field of Welles scholarship continues to expand, there have been relatively few screen depictions of the man. Mr. Linklater, who at 49 has more completed features on his résumé than Welles, including studio hits (“The School of Rock”) and labor-of-love indies (“Before Sunset”), offered one possible explanation: “It’s an intimidating thing, obviously, as a filmmaker to go anywhere near Orson Welles.”

The Welles persona lends itself to jokey exaggeration. In Peter Jackson’s “Heavenly Creatures” (1994), Orson (Jean Guérin) is a comic grotesque who shows up in the fantasy lives of two teenage girls. Tim Burton’s biopic of the “world’s worst director,” “Ed Wood” (1994), stages an amusing meeting between Welles (Vincent D’Onofrio) and Wood (Johnny Depp), two put-upon visionaries exchanging industry war stories. (Mr. D’Onofrio went on to direct and star in a half-hour short, “Five Minutes, Mr. Welles,” about Welles learning his lines on the set of “The Third Man.”)

Even in an otherwise serious film like Tim Robbins’s “Cradle Will Rock” (1999), which recounts the Federal Theater Project’s heroic 1937 staging of a pro-labor musical, Welles (who directed the production, just a few months before the Mercury’s “Julius Caesar”) is played by Angus Macfadyen as a drunken buffoon.

Opting for relative restraint, actors like Liev Schreiber, in “RKO 281,” a 1999 HBO movie about the making of “Citizen Kane,” and Danny Huston, in “Fade to Black,” a 2006 thriller that imagines Welles at the center of a noirish murder mystery, have struggled to capture his charisma and bravado. (Mr. Huston’s father, the filmmaker John Huston, was a good friend of Welles, who appeared in several Huston films, including “Moby Dick,” and John Huston was the star of “The Other Side of the Wind,” a nearly complete but never released Welles feature.)

Mr. Linklater said he was mindful that a persuasive Welles, larger than life but not a caricature, would be a tricky balancing act. “I wouldn’t have done this movie if I couldn’t give Orson his due,” he said. He suspected that an unknown actor, while anathema to financiers (Mr. Linklater paid for the rights to Mr. Kaplow’s book, and the film was independently produced), would be his best bet. “That way the cinematic magic has a possibility of working,” he said.

In the spring of 2007 Mr. Kaplow tipped Mr. Linklater off to “Rosebud: The Lives of Orson Welles,” a one-man show written by Mark Jenkins that had won acclaim at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe and was arriving in New York for an Off Broadway run. Mr. Linklater saw the play, in which Mr. McKay embodies Welles from his boy-wonder prime into frustrated old age, and knew right away he had found his Orson.

To prepare for his Welles roles Mr. McKay listened to hundreds of hours of interviews, trying to nail Welles’s singular basso profundo. But while he was alert to physical details — “For a long time after shooting,” he said, “the bloody eyebrows kept moving” — he also wanted to convey less tangible qualities, like his magnetism and infectious confidence.

A concert pianist before he turned to acting, Mr. McKay, 36, said he drew partly on his younger self, flashing back to a time when “I was that arrogant and totally believing in my ability.” Mr. Linklater called Mr. McKay “a Wellesian figure” in his own right: “He’s the kid who was told at age 4 that he was a genius.”

Welles awes, dwarfs and eventually betrays the “me” in “Me and Orson Welles,” and some might accuse the film of the usual Welles bashing. His assigned role in this coming-of-age tale, after all, is to school the callow hero in the cruel ways of the world. But when people called the Welles in his movie a monster, Mr. Linklater said he found himself defending him: “It’s his theater; he’s paying for it. It’s his arena, the same way that some boss who owns a company wouldn’t be challenged. But it freaks people out to see it in art because they have some notion that it should be democratic.”

“Welles was such a supernova,” he continued. “People think it’s not natural, so they do their part to reduce him: a regression to the mean. But the achievements are too great. You can try, but you can’t really bring him back to earth.”

"Avatar": "60 Minutes" Special (Parte 2)

"Avatar": "60 Minutes" Special (Parte 1)

Pyramide nabs 'Sciences,' 'Nostalgia' - French company takes pair to Ventana Sur (Variety)


PARIS -- Gallic arthouse mini-major Pyramide Films has taken distribution rights to France, a key specialty film market, on Diego Lerman’s “Moral Sciences” and Patricio Guzman’s “Nostalgia for the Light.”

Pyramide has also acquired most international territory rights to the two films.

Deal announcement was made in the run-up to this week’s Ventana Sur market, where Pyramide will be presenting the pics to buyers.

Lerman attracted attention for Locarno Silver Leopard winner “Suddenly” and follow up “Meanwhile.”

“Sciences,” which rolls Dec. 7, is a step up in ambitions.

A 1982-set parable of repression and its consequences, set

in the last days of Argentina’s military dictatorship, “Sciences” turns on a 20-year-old woman monitor at a secondary school who goes to perverse lengths to unmask infringements, however petty, of school discipline.

“The school is a metaphor for the rest of Argentina and how the monitor becomes a victim of the regime she imposes,” Lerman said.

Budgeted at $1.1 million, “Sciences” is produced by Marc Bordure at France’s Agat Films, Imval and Campo Cine, Lerman’s label with producer partner Nicolas Avruj.

“Sciences’” screenplay by Maria Meira and Lerman won a 2009 Sundance/NHK Intl. Filmmakers Award for best Latin American script. Project was showcased at Cannes Festival’s Cinefondation Atelier.

Guzman’s follow up to “Salvador Allende,” docu-feature “Light” turns on the Chilean director’s reflections on the passage of time. These are inspired by observatories in Chile’s Atacama Desert whose telescopes detect the oldest light in the universe. Meanwhile, nearby, families search for the bodies of relatives murdered by Augusto Pinochet’s regime, which lie buried in a mass grave.

“We handled Lerman’s first two films and the script for ‘Sciences’ was great. I was immensely frustrated at not working on ‘Salvador Allende,’” said Pyramide CEO Eric Lagesse.

“Light” is produced by Renate Sachse for France’s Atacama Prods., Germany’s Blinker Prods. and WDR and Chile’s Cronomedia. Now in post, it will be delivered March 2010.

Weitz digs 'Gardener': ‘New Moon’ director plants next pic at Summit (Variety)


As "New Moon" soared toward a $258 million opening weekend worldwide, director Chris Weitz was in discussions with Summit Entertainment for his follow-up.

Weitz said he plans to go to work for Summit right away on "The Gardener," with deals in the works for Weitz and Eric Eason ("Manito"), who wrote the screenplay. The picture is about a hard-working immigrant who lives in Los Angeles and his efforts to protect his son.

Weitz said he will begin production in March or April.

"There are no werewolves or vampires, just a Mexican gardener in Los Angeles," Weitz said.

Weitz also dispelled reports that he would stop directing movies after "The Gardener," an assertion that came from an interview he gave to Moviemaker magazine. The retirement angle got picked up by the New York Post's Page Six late last week.

The report inferred that Weitz's exit was based on the rough treatment he got from New Line on "The Golden Compass."

Weitz did not deny that he had a terrible time on that movie, but said he was reinvigorated by "New Moon." He met his goal to broaden the visual scope of the film from the original while keeping it on budget and not overwhelming the appeal of the core love triangle.

Weitz said Summit and author Stephenie Meyer trusted him to honor the books while adding his own stylistic imprint, something that didn't happen on "The Golden Compass." He added that "Golden Compass" was taken away from him and that heavy-handed editing by New Line eliminated 30 minutes of footage and neutered any of the edge evident in the Philip Pullman books.

"It was an utter violation of my status as a director and the worst thing that has happened to me professionally," Weitz said. While he "bit through my tongue" when that film was released out of loyalty to cast and crew, he was very happy to see "New Moon" surpass grosses of "The Golden Compass."

"I was treated badly, it was almost like they never read the books. They seemed frightened of offending the right. This was a wonderful experience by comparison. I got to work with terrific young actors at the top of their game, and see Taylor Lautner perform so well."

His mind seemed squarely on his directing future and on Depth of Field, the company he runs with brother Paul, who's off directing "Little Fockers." Depth of Field's Tom Ford-directed "A Single Man" has Oscar hopes.

Weitz said he's learning to be careful about swearing off movies in interviews when he's drained from finishing one.


Radio Micropsia - Episodio 1


Link

Esta es la lista de temas que programé originalmente para la emisión de anoche de Micropsia por FM Rock de Radio Nacional (93.7). Obviamente que no entraron ni la mitad. Pero esto estaba en los planes. De a poco, calculo, nos iremos acomodando hasta que quede un programa más o menos ordenado. Hoy, pese a los apuros y a las dificultades técnicas, creo que más o menos fue algo presentable. Acá faltan los temas programados por Jorge B., si él me los puede/quiere mandar, los subiré en las próximas horas.

22.11.09

Desde hoy, Micropsia por Radio Nacional


Finalmente, luego de varias semanas de dudas, demoras, tribulaciones y otras complicaciones técnicas, esta noche comienzo un programa de radio que sostendrá el nombre de este blog, si bien no es necesariamente su versión radial. He aquí, entonces, Radio Micropsia.

Los domingos, de 20 a 22, entonces, por la FM de Radio Nacional (Rock), en el 93.7 de su dial o entrando al link que dejé ahí arriba y escuchándolo por internet podrán oir la voz de quien esto escribe junto a otro compañero de aventuras musicales, el amigo Jorge Belaunzarán, con el que trataremos de pasar buenos temas, hablar lo menos posible, recomendar un par de películas, de vez en cuando entrevistar a alguien y tratar de terminar enteros, sin pasar verguenzas.

Si todo funciona bien --el programa está en una versión piloto, o Beta, como se le dice ahora--, el asunto seguirá todos los domingos y luego dejaré por aquí el link donde subimos algunas selecciones musicales que deberían haberse escuchado en el programa (aunque uno siempre prepara más de lo que finalmente pasa).

Así que en eso estamos...

21.11.09

'New Moon' takes opening day record (Variety)


Summit Entertainment’s “The Twilight Saga: New Moon” tore up the box office record for best opening day, grabbing the title away from Warner Bros. “The Dark Knight,” and earning a spectacular $72.7 million yesterday at 4,024 theaters.

An exceptional feat for a film playing outside the summer frame.

There were an array of estimates being reported on the internet about how high the first day of "New Moon" actually was. This morning's figure is Summit's official Friday estimate.

“Dark Knight” had minted $67.2 million from 4,366 runs on July 18, 2008 before making a three-day opening weekend of $158.4 million.

Fueling the Friday B.O. for “New Moon” were midnight shows in 3,514 venues which drew a record-breaking $26.3 million for the time slot.

The opening day for “New Moon” posted more than a 100% gain over the first Friday of “Twilight” which made $36 million a year ago and a three-day weekend of $69.6 million.

For a franchise that has clearly targeted females, "New Moon’s" first day is so exceptional that it’s probable that the film played beyond its core crowd to males. However, Summit plans to release the pic’s moviegoing demos, as well as international results, in its three-day estimate report tomorrow. Ever since the first installment finished its play in theaters, the production of "New Moon" has garnered non-stop headlines on glossy covers and fansites with the media savoring details on the film as well as its cast members Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson and Taylor Lautner.

Capitalizing on those older women who might have been shut out of "New Moon" as well as male football fans who might be sidestepping the vampire pic, Warner Bros. benefitted its counterprogramming of Sandra Bullock drama "The Blind Side." The football drama about rookie Baltimore Ravens player Michael Oher posted $10.9 million off 3,110 – the second best ever for a Bullock headliner following her record opening day of "The Proposal" this summer with $12.7 million.

Sony’s Roland Emmerich disaster pic "2012" fell 65% in its second Friday to third with $8.1 million off 3,408. Pic’s domestic cume stands at close to $90 million with a worldwide total north of $313 million. "2012" looks to zip past the $400 million global B.O. mark by tomorrow.

In its third Friday, Lionsgate’s "Precious: Based on the story ‘Push’ by Sapphire," at play in under 1,000 engagements, continued to draw heavy traffic. "Precious" took fourth with an estimated $3.5 million, repping an uptick of 85% thanks to its expansion from 174 to 629 sites. To date, the domestic B.O. for "Precious" stands at $13.9 million.

Catering to moppets on Thanksgiving break, Sony’s animated entry "Planet 51" landed in fifth with $3.2 million off 3,035. Featuring the voices of Dwayne Johnson, Jessica Biel, Justin Long and Gary Oldman, "Planet 51" touts a comical "E.T."-in-reverse story whereby a U.S. astronaut lands on an alien planet and urgently needs to get home. Pic is an acquisition from Spanish producers Ilion Animation.

"Disney’s A Christmas Carol" stayed afloat, declining 47% at the onset of its third sesh with $3 million off 3,578 and running B.O. of $70.6 million in sixth place.

Arthouse theater averages continued to be bountiful yesterday with Sony Pictures Classics’ Pedro Almodovar romance drama "Broken Embraces" starring Penelope Cruz earning $16,816 or $34,000 off two Gotham engagements.

Fox Searchlight’s "Fantastic Mr. Fox" also minted a hearty per site of $13,103 in its second Friday for $52,000 off four Gotham and Los Angeles playdates. Through eight days, "Mr. Fox" counts a total domestic take of $410,536. Searchlight is scheduled to up the film’s theater count on Wednesday.

First Look’s "Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans" grossed $74,000 from 27 for a theater average of $2,740. The crime-drama, starring Nicolas Cage and Eva Mendes and directed by Werner Herzog, is a sequel to the Abel Ferrara graphic cult 1992 pic which made $2 million stateside.

Festival de Huelva: premios oficiales


Huelva, 21 de noviembre. El jurado de la Sección Oficial a Concurso de la 35 edición del Festival de Cine Iberoamericano de Huelva compuesto por Mireia Ros, Manuel Pérez Estremera, Esteban Mentasti, Clara Sánchez y Sonia Almarcha –en el apartado de largometrajes- ha decidido por mayoría, excepto el galardón al Mejor Actor que ha sido por unanimidad, otorgar los siguientes premios:

-Colón de Oro al Mejor Largometraje a la película ‘La nana’, de Sebastián Silva (Chile).

-Premio Especial del Jurado a la película ‘Francia’, de Israel Adrián Caetano (Argentina).

-Carabela de Plata a la Mejor Ópera Prima a la película ‘La mosca en la ceniza’, de Gabriela David (Argentina)*.

-Colón de Plata a la Mejor Dirección a Sebastián Silva por la película ‘La nana’ (Chile).

-Colón de Plata al Mejor Actor a Fernando Luján por la película ‘Cinco días sin Nora’ (México).

-Colón de Plata a la Mejor Actriz a Catalina Saavedra por la película ‘La nana’, de Sebastián Silva (Chile).

-Colón de Plata al Mejor Guión Original a Héctor Gálvez por la película ‘Paraíso’ (Perú).

-Colón de Plata a la Mejor Fotografía a Paúl de Lumen por la película ‘Zona Sur’, de Juan Carlos Valdivia (Bolivia).

-Premio del Público al Mejor Largometraje a la película ‘Héctor y Bruno’, de Ana Rosa Diego (España).

Por su parte, el Jurado de la Sección Oficial a Concurso en el apartado de cortometrajes, compuesto por Andrea Stavenhagen, Inmaculada González y Bernardo Romero, ha acordado por unanimidad conceder el siguiente premio y mención especial:

-Premio RTVA-Cajasol al Mejor Cortometraje para ‘Groelândia’, de Rafael Figueiredo (Brasil).

-Mención Especial al cortometraje ‘A guerra de Arturo’, de Pedro Arantes y Júlio Taubkin (Brasil).

*Las bases del certamen reconocen como ópera prima tanto el primero como el segundo largometraje.