4.1.10

James Cameron: Man of Extremes (The New Yorker)


By Dana Goodyear

The director James Cameron is six feet two and fair, with paper-white hair and turbid blue-green eyes. He is a screamer—righteous, withering, aggrieved. “Do you want Paul Verhoeven to finish this motherfucker?” he shouted, an inch from Arnold Schwarzenegger’s face, after the actor went AWOL from the set of “True Lies,” a James Bond spoof that Cameron was shooting in Washington, D.C. (Schwarzenegger had been giving the other actors a tour of the Capitol.) Cameron has mastered every job on set, and has even been known to grab a brush out of a makeup artist’s hand. “I always do makeup touch-ups myself, especially for blood, wounds, and dirt,” he says. “It saves so much time.” His evaluations of others’ abilities are colorful riddles. “Hiring you is like firing two good men,” he says, or “Watching him light is like watching two monkeys fuck a football.” A small, loyal band of cast and crew works with him repeatedly; they call the dark side of his personality Mij—Jim backward.

The pressures on Cameron are extreme, never mind that he has brought them on himself. His movies are among the most expensive ever made. “Terminator 2” was the first film to cost a hundred million dollars, “Titanic” the first to exceed two hundred million. But victory is sweeter after a close brush with defeat. “Terminator 2” earned five hundred and nineteen million around the world, and “Titanic,” which came out in 1997, still holds the record for global box-office: $1.8 billion.

Cameron is fifty-five. It has been twelve years since he has made a feature film; “Avatar,” his new movie, comes out on December 18th and will have cost more than two hundred and thirty million dollars by the time it’s done. He started working on it full time four years ago, from a script he wrote in 1994. “Avatar” will be the first big-budget action blockbuster in 3-D; Cameron shot it using camera systems that he developed himself. He is a pioneer of special effects: the undulating water column of “The Abyss” and the liquid-silver man of “Terminator 2” helped to inspire the digital revolution that has transformed moviemaking in the past two decades. The digital elements of “Avatar,” he claims, are so believable that, even when they exist alongside human actors, the audience will lose track of what is real and what is not. “This film integrates my life’s achievements,” he told me. “It’s the most complicated stuff anyone’s ever done.” Another time, he said, “If you set your goals ridiculously high and it’s a failure, you will fail above everyone else’s success.”

George Lucas popularized space opera; Steven Spielberg has perfected awe. Cameron’s movies, soaked in sweat and blood and scorched by apocalyptic flames, have romance at their molten cores. Some of his most memorable characters—Sarah Connor, the heroine of the “Terminator” movies; Ellen Ripley, of “Aliens”—are mothers. The writing is a genre of its own: “tech-noir,” Cameron called it after “Terminator”; his late-period style is more like gear-head schmaltz. “IN THE BLACKNESS we hear the lonely ping of a bottom sonar,” the beginning of his treatment for “Titanic” reads. “Then two faint lights appear, close together . . . growing brighter. They each resolve into clusters of lights, which are soon revealed to be two DEEP SUBMERSIBLES, falling toward us. We are somewhere in the ocean deep, looking up at two subs freefalling like express elevators. . . . Soon they are fireflies, then stars. Then gone.” Spielberg says, “He gets a lot of points for being a techno-brat, but he is a very emotional storyteller.”

“With ‘Avatar,’ I thought, Forget all these chick flicks and do a classic guys’ adventure movie, something in the Edgar Rice Burroughs mold, like John Carter of Mars—a soldier goes to Mars,” Cameron told me. The hero of “Avatar,” Jake Sully (Sam Worthington), is a paraplegic ex-marine who travels to Pandora, a moon in the Alpha Centauri star system, where there is a human colony. Humans can’t breathe the air on Pandora; Jake lies in a casket-like vessel, while his consciousness, projected into an “avatar”—Vishnu-blue and nine feet tall, like the native population, the Na’vi—explores Pandora’s rich interior. It is a fantasy about fantasy, about the experience of sitting inert in the dark while your mind enters another world. Set roughly a hundred and twenty-five years in the future, “Avatar” is, like most speculative science fiction, a cautionary tale. Humans have turned Earth into a wasteland and, in their pursuit of a precious superconductor called Unobtanium, are beginning to do the same to Pandora. Jake, through his avatar, falls in love with a Na’vi princess, who teaches him to live in harmony with nature, and then he leads her people in an insurrection against the colonists. “Of course, the whole movie ends up being about women, how guys relate to their lovers, mothers—there’s a large female presence,” Cameron said. “I try to do my testosterone movie and it’s a chick flick. That’s how it is for me.” This summer, addressing an auditorium filled with thousands of teen-age boys at Comic-Con, in San Diego—an annual convention of science-fiction, action-adventure, and fantasy fans—he made his identification with the fair sex complete. When someone in the audience asked about his next movie, he replied, “You know, it’s not a great time to ask a woman if she wants to have other kids when she’s crowning.”

Cameron behaves as if he were the embattled protagonist of one of his own films—an ordinary Joe beaten on the anvil of extraordinary trials. “The words ‘No’ and ‘That’s impossible’ and phrases like ‘That can’t be done’—that’s the stuff that gives him an erection,” the actor Bill Paxton, who has worked with Cameron since the early eighties, says. Cameron reserves a special quotient of his anger for suits who get in his way. “Tell your friend he’s getting fucked in the ass, and if he would stop squirming it wouldn’t hurt so much” was the message he once told a Fox producer to deliver to an executive at the studio. He sees himself as essentially outside and other and alone; he bites the hand that feeds. “Even though he knew I was on his side, nobody’s ever on his side,” Bill Mechanic, who ran Fox Studios during the making of “Titanic,” said. “It’s like you’re in the trenches and your infantry-mate is shooting at you, even if you’re the only one there who can save his life.”

There is a chivalric aspect to Cameron’s antagonism; he figures his struggles in heroic terms. “I try to live with honor, even if it costs me millions of dollars and takes a long time,” he says. “It’s very unusual in Hollywood. Few people are trustworthy—a handshake means nothing to them. They feel they’re required to keep an agreement with you only if you’re successful, or they need you. I’ve tried not to get sucked into the Hollywood hierarchy system. Personally, I don’t like it when people are deferential to me because I’m an established filmmaker. It’s a blue-collar sensibility.”

Cameron was born in Canada, and grew up in a small town not far from Niagara Falls. (He revoked his application for American citizenship after Bush won the election in 2004.) His father was an engineer for a paper company; his mother brought up five children, and told stories of racing stock cars and joining the women’s auxiliary of the Canadian Army. Jim was the oldest, the ringleader of his siblings and the other kids in the neighborhood. “There was always some new thing that absolutely needed to get done, whether it was building a fort or an airplane or launching rockets,” he told me. “We made it in the papers once, for a U.F.O. sighting over a hot-air balloon that we built and launched at night that was powered by candles.” His hero was Jacques Cousteau, and although he lived four hundred miles from the ocean, he became obsessed with scuba. He learned to dive in Buffalo one February in a Y.M.C.A. pool.

At fourteen, Cameron saw the movie that made him want to make his own: Stanley Kubrick’s “2001: A Space Odyssey,” the first cinematically exquisite treatment of what had traditionally been B-movie material. “I saw all these cool spacecraft and I wanted to know how the visual effects were done,” he said. “I started building my own models of spaceships, from the ‘2001’ model kit and the ‘making-of’ book, which was quite thick and well researched.” After he finished making “True Lies,” Cameron called Kubrick, by then a recluse, and invited himself over. They spent a day, in the basement of Kubrick’s house in the English countryside, watching “True Lies” at Kubrick’s flatbed editing station. Cameron went over the shots—Schwarzenegger in a Harrier jet firing a missile, with the villain attached to it, through an office building and into a helicopter: boom!—so that Kubrick could learn how the effects were done.

When Cameron was seventeen, his father was transferred to Southern California, and the family moved to Brea, a small city in Orange County. He had left Canada without a high-school diploma, and started taking classes at Fullerton Junior College, supporting himself by working as a precision tool-and-die machinist. “My dad was a college graduate,” he said. “But, see, I didn’t want to do the things he thought I should—you know, something good, like engineering.” He dropped out, and, when he was twenty-three, married a woman who worked as a waitress at a Bob’s Big Boy. For a while, he drove a truck for a local school district. In archetypal terms, this was his period of exile and self-denial, the refusal of the call. “I just became this blue-collar guy,” he said. “But I was constantly thinking as an artist, so I’m painting, drawing, writing, thinking about visual effects and filmmaking.”

In Brea, Cameron met William Wisher and Randall Frakes, who also wanted to make movies, and who are still his two best friends. Eventually, they raised the money to make a short film, “Xenogenesis,” starring Wisher as a futuristic man in an orange jumpsuit who battles an armored robot with a metal pincer for a hand. It got Cameron a job sculpting models for Roger Corman in L.A.

Corman’s studio—a training ground for filmmakers like Francis Ford Coppola, Martin Scorsese, and Jonathan Demme—specialized in low-budget genre films. Cameron distinguished himself immediately, and soon he was designing sets. He was focussed—often working through the night—and he was scrappy. “He’d take all these random parts—Winnebago parts, industrial dishwashing racks, Sonotubes, a lot of paint—and turn them into an incredible set,” Paxton, who worked for Corman as a set dresser, recalled. For “Battle Beyond the Stars,” Corman’s takeoff on “Star Wars,” Cameron was asked to design the spaceships. “His sketches were brilliant,” Corman said. “The best of that type of work that I had ever seen.” Each spaceship reflected the character of its pilot, and also Cameron’s instinct for the iconic, literal image; to the mother ship, Nell, he gave a curvaceous shape and a pair of heaving breasts.

James Cameron doesn’t go to the bathroom; he goes to the head. In his universe, there is no front and back, right and left, just fore and aft, starboard and port. He is still an avid scuba diver; when there are sharks in the water, he says, he’s the first one in. Free-diving, he has held his breath for more than three minutes and reached a depth of a hundred and ten feet. (“You feel like a denizen of the deep, if only for a second,” he says. “Plus, diving below the scuba divers, I like just to see the look on their faces.”) He used to have a JetRanger helicopter, and owns a slew of dirt bikes, three Harleys, a Ducati, and a Ford GT—“basically a race car with a license plate”—in classic blue-and-white livery. In Corvettes, he has favored triple black—black body, black interior, black top. For pleasure, he designs submersibles; the one he’s working on now can go to thirty-six thousand feet, and he hopes to use it to explore the Mariana Trench, the deepest spot on earth. He signs his missives “Jim out,” and, when he’s working, a deep mechanical roar, like a Navy klaxon, summons him to the stage. “Dive! dive! dive!” he said, an intent look in his eyes, when I asked him what the signal meant.

I first met Cameron in April of 2008. “Avatar” was in its third year of production. For much of that time, Cameron had been working out of a couple of hangars in Playa del Rey, south of Los Angeles.* He was sitting in his office, a small room at the edge of one of the hangars, beside a bust of a feline-looking blue alien covered in bioluminescent spots: Neytiri, the Na’vi princess. “Our leading lady,” Cameron called her, or just “the blue chick.” He was wearing a T-shirt that said “Scubapro” and had a pair of earphones around his neck. Despite moviegoers’ associations of 3-D with schlocky horror films and animated stuff for kids, Cameron said he was resolved to work in the medium: “It gives you more of a sense of participation, involvement, and immersion. You feel like you’re bearing witness, and that makes the journey feel more real.” It was also a business decision. Having developed the camera technology, he knew that only a high-profile movie, such as “Avatar” promises to be, would accelerate the conversion of theatres. “I said, ‘They know the product. They better get ready.’ It was a little bit cheeky—a leap of faith that the screens would be there for us.” That spring, there were about fifteen hundred 3-D screens in the United States; by December, there will be three times that many. (“Avatar” will also have a wide release in 2-D.)

There was a knock at the door. “I have to go make a shot,” Cameron said. He walked swiftly toward the floor of the hangar, a vast industrial space that he referred to as “the performance-capture volume.” The stage floor, furnished with just a low riser, had been painted battleship gray. Zoë Saldana, who plays Neytiri, stood among a group of actors wearing black unitards covered with reflective white dots: a retro vision of the computer age, Pilobolus style. The ceiling was studded with black-and-white surveillance cameras that tracked the actors’ movements and positioned their performances inside a digital set—in this case, a Na’vi battle camp deep in the rain forest, where Jake’s avatar is preparing the warriors to fight with bows and arrows against the high-tech human war machines. Saldana wore a special head rig fitted with a tiny camera that floated inches from her face, to capture her expressions in minute detail: the movements of her facial muscles, the contractions of her pupils, the interaction of her teeth, lips, and tongue. The data uploaded to a dozen computers banked around the room, which translated the movements of the actors onto the physiques of their digital characters, and fed the images, along with the digital set design, into the eyepiece of Cameron’s “virtual camera”—essentially, a viewfinder with a monitor. For him, it was like directing a live-action shoot on Pandora. Saldana, who is five feet seven, performed in his eyepiece as a nine-foot alien in a rain forest.

On cue, the actors began to make strange trilling sounds, ejectives and glottal stops and rolled “r”s: Na’vi. Cameron stopped the scene. “When Jake goes”—Cameron uttered a mellifluous sentence in Na’vi—“you go, ‘Whoop! Whoop!’ ”

Back in his office, Cameron played an unfinished scene from “Avatar” on a large screen. The renderings were crude, like paper cutouts: the graphic sophistication of a nineteen-nineties video game. Neytiri—hipless, lean, with proportions to make Barbie look like a Cabbage Patch Kid—crouched on a tree limb high above the forest floor. She spotted Jake’s avatar for the first time, and took aim. The next shot was much more evolved. Neytiri’s skin was tactile and radiant; her eyes were huge and green and flecked with light, like five-dollar marbles from Conran. “This is ninety or ninety-five per cent done,” Cameron said. “By the way, we didn’t have the equipment when we started this. It took nine months to build the computer model and to get it right. It’s incredibly computationally complex, but now we’re able to replicate the interaction of muscle under skin.” He stopped the footage on a closeup of Neytiri’s face. “She exists only as a big string of ones and zeroes,” he said, as if he could not quite believe it himself. “Computing a single frame of this takes thirty hours.” He paused. “Everybody in this building has had more college than I have.”

All directors have a God complex; Cameron takes his unusually seriously. For “Avatar,” he worked with a linguist to develop the Na’vi language, inspired by fragments of Maori he picked up in New Zealand years ago. He based Pandora, and its myriad flora (spike tears, cliff slouchers, stinger ivy) and fauna (direhorses, banshees, slinths), partly on the creatures of the coral reefs and kelp forests he has seen at the abyssal depths. He hired a team of artists to execute his ideas, but reserved one creature for himself: the thanator, a six-legged black pantherlike beast, twenty-four feet long, covered in plate scales, with a reptilian double set of jaws and a threat display resembling that of a fan lizard. “The thanator is the baddest, meanest predator the planet had to offer,” Neville Page, the lead creature designer, said. “As Jim put it in the treatment, a thanator can eat an Alien for dessert. He wanted to outdo himself, outdo the Alien Queen.”

“Creating a universe is daunting,” George Lucas said. “I’m glad Jim is doing it—there are only a few people in the world who are nuts enough to. I did it with ‘Star Wars,’ and now he’s trying to challenge that. It’s a lot of work. I do believe Jim will take this further out than anyone’s ever conceived of.”

Cameron inserts himself into every aspect of the filmmaking process. With the virtual camera, he is both cinematographer and camera operator, working in his favorite style, handheld, for what he calls “an edgy, subjective quality.” The camera eliminates the need for cable cars, helicopters, or cranes, allowing him to shoot from any vantage point he chooses. “When I say, ‘Make me three to one,’ what I’m saying is ‘Make me eighteen feet tall,’ ” he said. “At that point, I’ve become a techno crane. If I say, ‘Make me twenty to one,’ I’m a helicopter.” The Na’vi, too, are an extension of Cameron. He mentioned that he is a lefty. “Guess what,” he said. “The Na’vi are all left-handed now.” He taught Zoë Saldana how to shoot her bow, as he envisioned it. “It’s a two-fingered inverted draw past the head, like a Samurai,” he said, tracing the shape in the air over his left shoulder. “The archery instructor came and said, ‘Do you want me to teach them archery or do you want me to teach them this? This would never work.’ I said, ‘See that bush?’ It was a hundred and fifty feet away. I nailed it.”

The next time I saw Cameron, the lights were low. A year had passed. His hair was longer and whiter, and he had grown a small paunch; later, I learned that he had broken a tooth and hadn’t bothered to fix it. (“I don’t smile that broadly anyway,” he said.) He was alone, moving slowly, grapevining his left foot gingerly over his right leg as he made his way around the performance-capture volume, in soft-soled slip-ons. (“Like a waitress, I have to wear sensible shoes.”) He had the virtual camera in front of him; he was lost, like a gamer in a trance. A large monitor nearby displayed what he saw in his eyepiece: a digital aircraft with a human pilot, crashing through the lush Pandoran jungle.

Cameron was choosing angles for a sequence that had been captured months before. When he finished, he looked up at Jon Landau, his producer, who was standing at the edge of the space. Landau used to work for Fox, where he oversaw the production of “True Lies,” before going to work for Cameron’s production company, Lightstorm, in 1995. His T-shirt said something about Tommy Bahama’s Dive Bar; staying close to Cameron means embracing scuba culture in whatever way you can.

“What’s with the tan?” Cameron asked him. “No one’s supposed to have a tan here. We’re in here fourteen hours a day. We see the sun as we drive to work, and not again till the next morning.”

“I fell asleep by the pool in Vegas yesterday,” Landau said. Cameron looked appalled.

Hours passed; Cameron danced. Eventually, Stephen Lang, who plays the film’s villain, came in, wearing heavy boots and a soiled, bloodstained camouflage jacket. A long, flexible arrow was stuck into his chest.

“Should there be more blood on my shirt?” he asked.

“We’re going to play it that the arrow seals the wound,” Cameron said.

“Thank you, Jim!” Landau said. He is trying to keep the film PG-13.

Most of “Avatar” ’s live-action scenes were filmed in New Zealand in 2007, but, the next day, Cameron had to get a few shots of Lang inside an “armored mobility platform,” or AMP suit. The suit, which, in the finished film, will be a combination of digital effects and physical set, is a menacing piece of military hardware, like a personal tank. A prop guy asked if the suit would have any bearing on how Lang’s character reacted when attacked.

“That’s a damn good question,” Cameron said. “We’ve already established the idea that when the suit is grabbed it looks like it’s in agony.” Cameron put on a nasal, whiny voice—his rendition of a fixated fanboy. “ ‘How come the suit didn’t move the right way? The fourteenth time I saw the film, in my basement, I really questioned the editorial integrity of it.’ ” He laughed, and then grew suddenly serious, as if aware that he had just said something jinxy: he should be so fortunate. “O.K.—shirt with schmutz and sweat,” he said, fingering the fabric around the entry wound. He looked down at his hands, which were now smeared with fake blood. “I have so much blood on my hands, from all the movies, metaphorically and psychically,” he said.

That night at half past eight, Cameron marched upstairs, two at a time, to a mess of cubicles he called “the lab,” where artists and programmers were stationed at computer screens. The lab smelled of coffee. Nearly everyone had chin hair. Cameron headed for a screening room for his nightly video conference with Weta, Peter Jackson’s digital-effects studio, in New Zealand, which was responsible for taking the basic renderings done by Cameron’s team and turning them into photo-realistic images: the bright, sentient eyes; the muscle under skin; the movement of wind, water, hair. Jackson says that “Avatar” ’s digital characters are more nuanced and vivid than any that have come before. “I’ve seen people looking at ‘Avatar’ shots, being convinced they are somehow looking at actors in makeup,” he wrote me in an e-mail.

Cameron, Landau, and several others sat in the dark, facing a large screen. A smaller screen showed six artists from Weta, at a conference table in New Zealand. “Avatar” has nearly three thousand effects shots; Cameron will review some of them as many as twenty times. He is an exacting critic, and an exuberant showoff, and the meetings provide a captive audience. Any disagreement is resolved with the indisputable logic of an older sibling who has invented a game and deigned to let his kid brother play: his universe, he wins. “I hate this fucking thing, but I can be very specific about it,” he said, when an image of a rock arch sacred to the Na’vi came up on the screen. “This looks like petrified wood,” he said, circling the offending part with a red laser pointer. “It has a longitudinal grain structure. It looks very fragile to me. This hard, crystally structure looks like barn wood. We want to say that this arch formed as igneous rock, that it’s a lava formation that got eroded, but it’s fracturing out along the crystal planes of minerals.”

At one point, Landau asked if Jake’s avatar’s ears looked a touch too red in a closeup shot. “When you direct your movie with nine-foot-tall blue people, you can do whatever you want,” Cameron said. “The ears are red when they’re backlit. That’s how they look.”

“Agreed,” Landau said cheerfully. He seemed used to it.

The meeting ended on a boisterous note. “That fuckin’ rocks!” Cameron called out in response to an image of a snarling maw of thin blue-veined tissue, the mouth of the pterodactyl-like banshee that Jake’s avatar domesticates for his ride. “Look at the gill-like membrane on the side of the mouth, its transmission of light, all the secondary color saturation on the tongue, and that maxilla bone. I love what you did with the translucence on the teeth, and the way the quadrate bone racks the teeth forward. It’s a sharky thing. As wacky as this creature is, it looks completely real. Maybe I’m getting high on my own supply.” He was practically out of breath. “The banshee lives! He’s a fierce-looking sonuvabitch.”

Home, for Cameron, is a fortress of preparedness. Since 1992, he has lived in Malibu, in a gated community called Serra Retreat, a patch of scrubby hillside across the highway from the beach. Mel Gibson lives in Serra Retreat; Britney Spears used to be Cameron’s neighbor there. Cameron’s place is a custard-colored nineteen-eighties Spanish house, with a red tile roof, in a small cul-de-sac; at the end of his driveway, there is a gate, beyond which stands a red Humvee platform fire truck and a uniformed security guard, with a clipboard and a badge. Ex-military buddies of his younger brother John David, who served as a marine in Iraq during the first Gulf War, sometimes provide additional security.

Cameron’s imagination was shaped by the Cold War; the threat of nuclear annihilation is a recurring theme. But he also admires the military and its accessories. “I suppose you could say I believe in peace through superior firepower,” he told me. “I don’t believe that the human race is going to suddenly evolve to the point that we can all join hands and sing ‘Kumbaya.’ ” He learned to shoot—shotguns, assault rifles, pistols—in the early eighties, when he was writing “The Terminator.” “I didn’t want to write like an idiot, based on some kind of comic-book knowledge,” he said. “I do a lot of things in the pursuit of creating a patina of reality in what is basically fantasy.” He has continued his education, training with a handgun expert on a course with pop-up targets, and spending a lot of time in the desert with his friends, shooting up watermelons and jalopies with an AK-47.

Five years ago, Cameron bought the house next door, which had belonged to George C. Scott. Same architect, same style. It contains a post-production facility, and has editing rooms and a screening room. One recent morning, a young male assistant was in the kitchen, sorting silverware, while another made coffee. A tiled center island was laden with pudgy chocolate-chip muffins and cannisters of pretzels: suburban-abundance comfort food, for people working around the clock. Cameron came in at nine and poured himself a decaf. (He stopped drinking caffeine after “Terminator 2.”) He was wearing jeans and an Atlantic-blue button-down shirt. He walked out the back door to a large pool and patio. Lawn chairs and chaises and glass-topped tables suggested various forms of leisure. Cameron looked at the furniture uncertainly, as if he had never contemplated using it before. He chose a spot under an umbrella. Belle, one of three black German shepherds Cameron keeps, dropped a slimy tennis ball at his feet.

“We have a big fire problem here,” he said. He mentioned that he has his own pump house. “We take the pool water, mix it with Class A foam, and pump it out over the whole property. Everybody else just runs for the hills.” He threw his hands up and did a squeaky voice. “ ‘Oh, my God!’ We sit and wait. Put on our yellow coats and our breathing gear and wait. And, you know what? It’s impressive. When these hills light up with a hundred-foot-tall wall of flames coming over the top of the hill there, you feel like it’s Armageddon.”

Cameron has had five wives (waitress, producer, director, actress, actress). He has four children, ranging in age from sixteen to two, and a nineteen-year-old stepson. Since 2000, he has been married to Suzy Amis, who had a small role in “Titanic.” She no longer acts; several years ago, she founded Muse Elementary, a private school with an emphasis on ecological consciousness, in a setting that is, according to its Web site, a “dye-free, toxin-free, pesticide-free zone.”

Before Amis, Cameron was married to Linda Hamilton, who played Sarah Connor, a woman hunted by unstoppable cyborgs, in the “Terminator” films. As Hamilton recalls it, she and Cameron didn’t get along particularly well during the first shoot. “My joke after that movie was, That man is definitely on the side of the machines,” she said. For the sequel, in which Sarah Connor has become a near-psychotic paramilitary fighter deranged by her foreknowledge of the imminent destruction of the world, Hamilton spent a year on a merciless fat-free diet, and trained with a former Mossad agent, who taught her to strip weapons blindfolded while he threw things at her and asked for her identification number. She got so that she could escape from L.A.P.D. handcuffs using just a paper clip.

Not long after Cameron finished shooting “Terminator 2,” he got divorced from his wife at the time, the director Kathryn Bigelow. (They are still friends: Bigelow says that when she got the finished script for “The Hurt Locker,” her latest film, Cameron was the first person whose opinion she sought out.) He and Hamilton got together, and moved into the house in Serra Retreat. “The very first night, I realized it was a mistake,” she told me. “He was the controlling director. The person I’d seen on set came back to life—we’re in his environment, and I didn’t have much of a say-so.” She found herself on survivalist weekends in the desert, flying kit planes and shooting fruit, and riding shotgun in Cameron’s Corvette. “It was Jimbo who had the love of fast cars, but as the warrior bride I was on the back of the motorcycle,” she said. She wanted to get married, but Cameron, she says, was not interested in a conventional domestic life: “He used to say to me, ‘Anybody can be a father or a husband. There are only five people in the world who can do what I do, and I’m going for that.’ ” She got pregnant, and moved out when their daughter, Josephine—Cameron’s first child—was nine months old.

Despite living apart, Cameron and Hamilton remained a couple, and he proved to be a devoted father. “We’d have a fight at Geoffrey’s”—a surf-and-turf restaurant on the Pacific Coast Highway—“and go our separate ways,” she said. “Much alcohol was consumed by Linda Hamilton.” After six years, when Cameron was making “Titanic,” they married. Hamilton was going to get scuba-certified, but the relationship unravelled too rapidly for that. “In the end, it was an eight-month marriage, and he went off with someone who’s much better suited to him,” Hamilton said. They divorced, and Cameron and Amis married shortly thereafter.

Wisher, Cameron’s old friend, says that strong women are one of the constants in Cameron’s life: “He likes to write about ’em and he likes to marry ’em. If there’s one or two themes that run through his life and work, that’s at the top of the list. That and self-determination. ‘There is no fate but what you make’—that line from ‘The Terminator.’ That’s his credo, I’m sure.”

Keep Reading

2010: Godard, Malick, Hong, Loach, Kiarostami, Tarr and More (The Auteurs)


By David Hudson

A few previews are already in. At In Contention, Kristopher Tapley lists ten big budget roll-outs he's looking forward to in 2010; the New York Times (where Michael Cieply explains why some films opening this year have been in the can and waiting their turn for as long as two years now) and the Boston Phoenix's Peter Keough draft local schedules for the weeks ahead; Geoffrey Macnab (Independent) and Kevin Maher (London Times) do the anticipating for the UK; Martin A Grove's preview for Reuters runs through June; and at Techland, Steven James Snyder looks ahead to the year in science fiction. Dark Horizons is previewing the good, the bad and the ugly, a gadzillion movies, in alphabetical order. As I write, they've made it to the letter "S."

But two entries Screen's Fionnuala Halligan posted at her blog back in November present far more tantalizing prospects than all that. In the first, she lists over twenty films that might make it into February's Berlinale lineup (and of course, we now know about seven that have), and in the second, she lays out an even longer of list of contenders for Cannes 2010. While I'd happily get in line for most of titles on these pages, I thought I'd pick out about a dozen that seem most intriguing and poke around to see what we know about them so far. Comments on these and other films you're looking forward to are welcome.

Jean-Luc Godard's Socialisme could be the film of our time - but of course, as with all these as-yet-unseen films, we just have no way of knowing yet. But if Godard is going to be arguing the case suggested by his title, he may find the world more ready to listen than he probably assumed it would be when he first conceived of the project. As Mark Fisher, author of Capitalist Realism, tells Matthew Fuller in Mute, "It took a few years after the 1929 crash for new political forces to emerge, and just because nothing much has happened yet doesn't mean it won't ever happen. The terrain is strewn of ideological rubble, and it's there to be fought over."

Or, you know, there's an outside chance that the film's an apolitical romp. Doesn't look like it, though. Daniel Kasman posted the 4+minute teaser back in May, when Wild Bunch was talking it up in Cannes and Screen's Nancy Tartaglione reported that it's "being billed as a symphony in three movements and mixes an international set of characters on a cruise ship including a Moscow policeman, a war criminal of unknown origins, a French philosopher, an American singer (played by Patti Smith), a Palestinian ambassador and a former double agent." We also know that the cast includes philosopher Alain Badiou. Jeremy Heilman has the official synopsis.

For ages, it seemed, we knew that Terrence Malick was shooting The Tree of Life - but that was all we knew. Speculation at Wikipedia, for example, was rampant - the production seems to have been rather rocky - but now Summit Entertainment has posted something of a synposis. "Our picture is a cosmic epic, a hymn to life." A bit of the story follows: a boy learns that the world is not as wondrous as it once seemed. The film may be set in the 50s; there may be an excursion or two into the prehistoric past. Some of these details might be worrying if it weren't a Malick film we're dealing with here. Brad Pitt and Sean Penn headline the cast; Emmanuel Lubezki is the cinematographer.

Lee Hyo-won has a fine piece in the Korean Times on the "2010 Korean Cinema Lineup," and it's here that we learn: "Director Hong Sang-soo will present his 10th movie Ha Ha Ha early [this] year. The movie depicts two friends who chat about their recent trips to Tongyeong over drinks. Actor Kim Sang-kyeong plays filmmaker Cho Mun-kyung, who wants to go study in Canada, while actor Yoo Joon-sang plays his friend and film critic Park Jung-shik." This may test the patience of those who found Hong spinning his wheels in Like You Know It All. At any rate, also cast is Moon So-ri, star of Oasis.

Speaking of which (and back to Lee Hyo-won): Oasis director Lee Chang-dong's Poem (also listed here and there as Poetry), starring Yoon Hee-jeong, "is a story about a 60-something woman who raises her teenage granddaughter and receives basic living subsidies. One day she signs up for a literature class and begins to write her own poems for the first time. The movie is slated to open in early May."

And, what can I say, a third film from Korea. For some time now, the free availability of Kim Ki-young's 1960 classic The Housemaid has turned it into quite the hit here at The Auteurs. Now it's to be remade by Im Sang-soo (The President's Last Bang) with Jeon Do-yeon, who won accolades for her performance in Lee Chang-dong's Secret Sunshine. Also slated to open in Korea in May.

Ken Loach's "new film is called Route Irish, its name taken from the infamous, dangerous road that links Baghdad's international Green Zone with the city's airport, and it marks the 73-year-old director's first attempt to grapple with the Iraq War of the past six years." Dave Calhoun in a set report for Time Out London: "Loach's sympathies are well known: he has spoken out in opposition to the invasion and occupation of Iraq. But Route Irish doesn't deal with high politics. Instead, it explores the murky world of British ex-soldiers who work for private contractors in Iraq, many of whom, such as the film's main character, Fergus (Mark Womack), are grieving for lost colleagues or suffering from post-traumatic stress. Fergus is living back in his home city in an apartment funded by his contracting work and having to face the demons Iraq foisted on him. We meet him at the funeral of a colleague and close childhood friend, and he's burning up with anger and thoughts of revenge."

There seems to be a general assumption out there that Abbas Kiarostami's Certified Copy will see its premiere in Cannes this year. From Eric Lavallee's Ioncinema report on the shoot in Italy in June: "Based on an original script by Kiarostami, this tells the story of a British author (William Shimell replaces Sami Frey) who travels to Italy to hold a conference on the relationship between originals and copies in the art world. During the conference he meets a French art gallery owner (Juliette Binoche). The author plays along but the innocent charade becomes a dangerous game as the lines between reality and make-believe blur."

Way back in October 2008, Fabien Lemercier reported in Cineuropa that Béla Tarr was to begin shooting The Turin Horse within weeks; Halligan expects that the film should finally be ready this year. Lemercier: "Co-written by the director and his usual collaborator László Krasznahorkai, the film is freely inspired by an episode that marked the end of philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche's career. On January 3, 1889, on the piazza Alberto in Turin, a weeping Nietzsche flung his arms around an exhausted and ill-treated carriage horse, then lost consciousness. After this event - which forms the prologue to Tarr's film - the philosopher never wrote again and descended into madness and silence. From this starting point, The Turin Horse goes on to explore the lives of the coachman ([Miroslav] Krobot), his daughter ([Erika] Bók) and the horse in an atmosphere of poverty heralding the end of the world." Quiet Earth has what seems to be an official synopsis.

Tran Anh Hung's Norwegian Wood (click the title for a synopsis) is, of course, an adaptation of the novel by Haruki Murakami and features Rinko Kikuchi and Kenichi Matsuyama. Back in June, in the Japan Times, Giovanni Fazio asked Tran about recreating the 60s-era atmo: "We're going to have to shoot every scene at different places, all over Japan. For example, there's a scene with a pool, and we're using a pool about an hour outside the city, because there's nothing suitable in Tokyo. Tokyo's always changing, and there's almost nothing left that reminds one of the 60s." For more, see a topic on the film in the Forum that was pretty lively a few months ago.

Back in March, FirstShowing's Alex Billington reported that Freida Pinto (Slumdog Millionaire and Woody Allen's upcoming You Will Meet a Tall Dark Stranger) was joining Hiam Abbass in the cast of Julian Schnabel's Miral, "an adaptation of Italo-Palestinian Rula Jebreal's book about Hind Husseini who founded an orphanage in Jerusalem in the wake of the 1948 partition of Palestine and the creation of the state of Israel." Schnabel also evidently hopes to see an English translation of the book appear at about the same time as the film.

Nanni Moretti is directing himself as a psychiatrist called in to treat a newly elected Pope - played by Michel Piccoli - who doesn't want the job. Der Standard reports that shooting for Habemus Papam begins this month and will wrap in May.

Viewing. Even though it's in German, this Arte report presents a fairly unique shoot. In Orly, Angela Schanelec follows four couples in the bustling airport with two cameras, no artificial lighting, no clearing of non-participants.

What else are we looking forward to in 2010?

Regalo de Reyes anticipado


Felicidades

No creo siquiera que dure online hasta Reyes, pero es un regalito al fin...

Pixies - Doolittle Live EP (2009)









"Avatar" en la Argentina: 268.410 espectadores


Algunos datos de la recaudación argentina de "Avatar"

59,369 115,105 93,936 268,410

Estas son las cifras de viernes, sábado, domingo y las totales de los tres días. La película se estrenó el viernes, pero ese día sólo estuvieron abiertas al público 164 de las 253 pantallas en las que se dio el filme, y muchas de ellas (o todas) a partir de las 18 horas, lo cual permite imaginar que las cifras hubiesen sido muy superiores siendo un viernes completo. Y eso sin hablar del jueves que "faltó". De haber sido un estreno normal, calculo que podría haber rondado los 350 mil espectadores.

3D versus 2D

-186,612 la vieron en salas 2D y 81.798 la vieron en 3D (no se si la cifra 3D incluye IMAX), pero siempre estoy hablando en cantidad de espectadores y no en recaudación, ya que allí entra a pesar el mayor costo de la entrada a un cine en 3D.

-Se vio en un máximo de 217 pantallas 2D yde 37 en 3D. Esto es: 14,56% de pantallas 3D. Pero los espectadores que la vieron en 3D representan un 30,48% del total. Ergo: faltan pantallas 3D en el mercado.

-Sólo sumando los espectadores que fueron a ver "Avatar" en 3D (81.798), esa versión de la película queda segunda en el total de los filmes en cartel. "2012" viene después con 38.556.

-El 67,22% de la gente que fue al cine entre jueves y domingo lo hizo para ver "Avatar". Digamos, dos de cada tres. Podría haber sido mucho más, si se piensa que la película no estaba en cartel el jueves.

-En todo el mundo, la película cae muy poco en cantidad de espectadores de semana en semana. Aquí, sumando las fiestas (esto es, del hecho de que no existe el hábito de ir al cine en las fiestas, además de que muchos cines están cerrados), apuesto que el proximo fin de semana la película iguala o crece. De hecho, me tiro a que hace 300 mil entre el jueves 7 y el domingo 10, dependiendo un poco del absurdo clima que está haciendo en el país, claro...

-El resto del Top Ten y el análisis general, mañana en el diario...


Nota: las cifras las aporta ULTRACINE para el diario Clarín. Allí, claro, no tengo espacio para publicar los detalles...

El secreto de un crecimiento - Taquilla del cine nacional 2009 (Clarín)

A ver si descubren al colado de Clarín en la foto. No, no soy yo...


Awards Tracker: An Updated Guide To Awards Season (IndieWire)

Announced Awards

African-American Film Critics
Austin Film Critics
Boston Film Critics
Broadcast Film Critics
British Indie Awards
Chicago Film Critics
Cinema Eye Honors
Dallas-Fort Worth Critics
Detroit Film Critics
European Film Awards
Florida Film Critics
Golden Globes
Golden Satellites
Gotham Awards
Houston Critics
IDA Documentary Awards
Indiana Film Critics
Las Vegas Film Critics
London Film Critics
Los Angeles Film Critics
National Board of Review
National Society of Film Critics
New York Film Critics
New York Film Critics Online
Online Film Critics Society
Phoenix Film Critics
San Diego Critics
San Francisco Film Critics
Screen Actors Guild Awards
Southeastern Film Critics
Spirit Awards
St. Louis Film Critics
Toronto Film Critics
Utah Film Critics
Washington D.C. Area Critics


Summary of Winners

Best Picture
The Hurt Locker 11 wins (NY, LA, NSFC, Las Vegas, Austin, Satellites, Houston San Francisco, Boston, Gothams), 12 mentions (Globes, London, Online, BFCA, Utah, Southeastern, St. Louis, Detroit, African-American, NBR, Washington, NY Online)
Up In The Air 7 wins (Dallas, Florida, Southeastern, Utah, Indiana, NBR, Washington) 11 mentions (Globes, London, Online, Chicago, Dallas, African-American, BFCA, St. Louis, LA, Satellites, Detroit, NY Online)
Inglourious Basterds 3 wins (Toronto, Phoenix, San Diego) 13 mentions (Globes, BFCA, NSFC, Online, Chicago, Utah, Dallas, Southeastern, Detroit, NBR, Washington, NY Online)
Up 1 win (Detroit) 10 mentions (BFCA, African-American, Online Southeastern, Dallas, St. Louis, NBR, Washington, NY Online)
Precious 1 win (African-American Critics) 9 mentions (Globes, Dallas, BFCA, Southeastern, St. Louis, Spirits, Washington, NY Online, Satellites)
Avatar 1 win (NY Online) 4 mentions (Globes, London, Dallas, BFCA)
A Prophet 1 win (EFA) 1 mention (London)
Moon 1 win (British Indie)
Hunger 1 win (Toronto)
A Serious Man 9 mentions (BFCA, Southeastern, Online, Chicago, NBR, Dallas, Gothams, NY Online, Satellites)
(500) Days of Summer 6 mentions (Globes, Southeastern, St. Louis, Spirits, Detroit, NBR)
An Education 5 mentions (BFCA, Dallas, St. Louis, NBR, Satellites)
The Messenger 4 mentions (Southeastern, NBR, NY Online, Satellites)
Fantastic Mr. Fox 4 mentions (Dallas, Southeastern, Indiana, NY Online)
Invictus 3 mentions (BFCA, St. Louis, NBR)
Nine 3 mentions (Globes, BFCA, Satellites)
Amreeka 2 mentions (Gothams, Spirits)
It’s Complicated 2 mentions (Globes, Satellites)
Where The Wild Things Are 2 mentions (Chicago, NBR)
Julie & Julia 2 mentions (Globes, Satellites)
District 9 2 mentions (Dallas, Southeastern)
Star Trek 1 mention (NBR)
Summer Hours 1 mention (NSFC)
Bright Star 1 mention (Satellites)
The Stoning of Soraya M. 1 mention (Satellites)
Two Lovers 1 mention (NY Online)
Adventureland 1 mention (NY Online)
The Last Station 1 mention (Spirits)
Sin Nombre 1 mention (Spirits)
The Princess and the Frog 1 mention (African-American)
This Is It 1 mention (African-American)
American Violet 1 mention (African-American)
Goodbye Solo 1 mention (African-American)
Good Hair 1 mention (African-American)
Medicine For Melancholy 1 mention (African-American)
The Maid 1 mention (Gothams)
Big Fan 1 mention (Gothams)
The Hangover 1 mention (Globes)
The White Ribbon 1 mention (London)

Best Director
Kathryn Bigelow, The Hurt Locker 14 wins (NY, LA, NSFC, San Francisco, Boston, Chicago, Southeastern, Houston, Satellites, NY Online, Washington, Las Vegas, Austin, Toronto) 6 mentions (BFCA, London, Online, St. Louis, Globes, Detroit)
Jason Reitman, Up in the Air 3 wins (Utah, Florida, Dallas) 7 mentions (Globes, Chicago, London, BFCA, Southeastern, St. Louis, Detroit, Washington)
Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds 2 wins (Phoenix, San Diego) 6 mentions (Globes, Online, Chicago, BFCA, St. Louis, Detroit, Washington)
Lee Daniels, Precious 1 win (African-American) 4 mentions (BFCA, Spirits, Satellites, Washington)
Clint Eastwood, Invictus 1 win (NBR) 3 mentions (Globes, BFCA, Washington)
Spike Jonze, Where The Wild Things Are 1 win (Indiana) 1 mention (Chicago)
Andrea Arnold, Fish Tank 1 win (British Indie)
Pete Docter, Up 1 win (Detroit)
James Cameron, Avatar - 4 mentions (London, Online, Globes, BFCA)
Joel & Ethan Coen, A Serious Man 3 mentions (Chicago, Online, Spirits)
Wes Anderson, Fantastic Mr. Fox - 3 mentions (Indiana, NSFC, St. Louis)
Michael Haneke, The White Ribbon 2 mentions (London, LA)
Neil Blomkamp, District 9 2 mentions (Online, Satellites)
Oren Moverman, The Messenger - 1 mention (St. Louis)
Jacques Audiard, A Prophet - 1 mention (London)
Cary Joji Fukunaga, Sin Nombre 1 mention (Spirits)
James Gray, Two Lovers 1 mention (Spirits)
Michael Hoffman, The Last Station 1 mention (Spirits)
Marc Webb, (500) Days of Summer 1 mention (Detroit)
Rob Marshall, Nine 1 mention (Satellites)
Lone Scherfig, An Education 1 mention (Satellites)
John Hillcoat, The Road 1 mention (Utah)
Olivier Assayas, Summer Hours 1 mention (NSFC)

Best Actor
George Clooney, Up in the Air 9 wins (NY, Dallas, Phoenix, Indiana, Florida, NBR, Houston, Southeastern, Washington) 9 mentions (Globes, Online, Chicago, SAGs, London, BFCA, St. Louis, Detroit, Satellites)
Jeremy Renner, The Hurt Locker 5 wins (NSFC, Las Vegas, Chicago, Satellites, Boston) 8 mentions (SAGs, Online, Utah, Southeastern, Indiana, BFCA, St. Louis, Washington)
Colin Firth, A Single Man 4 wins (Austin, Detroit, San Diego, San Francisco) 7 mentions (Globes, SAGs, BFCA, LA, Spirits, Washington, Satellites)
Jeff Bridges, Crazy Heart 2 wins (LA, NY Online) 10 mentions (SAGs, Chicago, NSFC, Online, London, Globes, BFCA, St. Louis, Spirits, Satellites)
Morgan Freeman, Invictus 2 wins (African-American, NBR) 5 mentions (SAGs, Globes, BFCA, St. Louis, Washington)
Michael Stuhlbarg, A Serious Man 1 win (Satellites) 3 mentions (London, Globes, Chicago)
Viggo Mortensen, The Road 1 win (Utah) 2 mentions (BFCA, Washington)
Nicolas Cage, Bad Lieutenant 1 win (Toronto) 1 mention (NSFC)
Tom Hardy, Bronson 1 win (British Indie)
Matt Damon, The Informant! 4 mentions (Globes, Chicago, Detroit, Satelllites)
Joseph Gordon-Levitt, (500) Days of Summer 3 mentions (Globes, Spirits, Detroit)
Daniel Day-Lewis, Nine 2 mentions (Globes, Satellites)
Tobey Maguire, Brothers 1 mention (Globes)
Sharlto Copley, District 9 1 mention (Online)
Joaquin Phoenix, Two Lovers 1 mention (Online)
Patton Oswalt, Big Fan - 1 mention (St. Louis)
Ben Foster, The Messenger - 1 mention (St. Louis)
Hugh Dancy, Adam 1 mention (Satellites)
Johnny Depp, Public Enemies 1 mention (Satellites)
Michael Sheen, The Damned United 1 mention (Satellites)
Bradley Cooper, The Hangover 1 mention (Satellites)
Sam Rockwell, Moon 1 mention (Detroit)
Souléymane Sy Savané, Goodbye Solo 1 mention (Spirits)
Adam Scott, The Vicious Kind 1 mention (Spirits)
Robert Downey Jr., Sherlock Holmes 1 mention (Globes)
Tahar Rahim, A Prophet 1 mention (London)
Christoph Waltz, Inglourious Basterds 1 mention (London)

Best Actress
Carey Mulligan, An Education 9 wins (NBR, Toronto, Dallas, San Diego, Utah, Chicago, Washington, Indiana, British Indie) 9 mentions (Globes, SAGs, London, Online, BFCA, St. Louis, LA, Detroit, Satellites)
Meryl Streep, Julie & Julia 7 wins (NY, San Francisco, Phoenix, Boston, Satellites, Southeastern, NY Online) 12 mentions (Globes, BFCA, SAGs, NSFC, Online, Chicago, London, Indiana, St. Louis, Detroit, Washington)
Gabourey Sidibe, Precious 3 wins (Detroit, Florida, Las Vegas) 9 mentions (Globes, SAGs, Chicago, BFCA, Online, Southeastern, St. Louis, Washington, Spirits)
Yolande Moreau, Seraphine 2 wins (NSFC, LA)
Melanie Laurent, Inglourious Basterds 1 win (Austin) 1 mention (Online)
Nicole Beharie, American Violet 1 win (African-American)
Michelle Mongahan, Trucker 1 win (San Diego)
Shoreh Aghdashloo, The Stoning of Soraya M. 1 win (Satellites)
Sandra Bullock, The Blind Side 4 mentions (SAGs, Globes, BFCA, Washington)
Abbie Cornish, Bright Star 4 mentions (Chicago, NSFC, London, Satellites)
Maya Rudolph, Away We Go 4 mentions (Chicago, Utah, St. Louis, Washington)
Helen Mirren, The Last Station 3 mentions (SAGs, Globes, Spirits)
Saoirse Ronan, The Lovely Bones 3 mentions (BFCA, St. Louis, Detroit)
Emily Blunt, The Young Victoria 3 mentions (BFCA, Satellites, Globes)
Sandra Bullock, The Proposal 2 mentions (Globes, Satellites)
Marion Cotillard, Nine 2 mention (Globes, Satellites)
Penelope Cruz, Broken Embraces 1 mention (Satellites)
Catalina Saavedra, The Maid 1 mention (Satellites)
Tilda Swinton, Julia 1 mention (Online)
Zooey Deschanel, 500 Days of Summer 1 mention (Satellites)
Katherine Heigl, The Ugly Truth 1 mention (Satellites)
Julia Roberts, Duplicity 1 mention (Globes)
Maria Bello, Downloading Nancy 1 mention (Spirits)
Gwenyth Paltrow, Two Lovers 1 mention (Spirits)
Nisreen Faour, Amreeka 1 mention (Spirits)
Alison Lohman, Drag Me to Hell 1 mention (Detroit)


Best Supporting Actor
Christoph Waltz, Inglourious Basterds 19 wins (NY, LA, NSFC, Phoenix, Detroit, Chicago, Florida, Dallas, Austin, Toronto, Las Vegas, San Diego, Houston, Satellites, Indiana, Southeastern, Boston, NY Online, Washington) 6 mentions (SAGs, Globes, BFCA, Online, St. Louis, Utah)
Christian McKay, Me & Orson Welles 2 wins (San Francisco, Utah) 5 mentions (BFCA, NSFC, Chicago, Detroit, Spirits)
Woody Harrelson, The Messenger 1 win (NBR) 11 mentions (BFCA, Chicago, SAGs, Globes, Online, Southeastern, St. Louis, Satellites, Detroit, Washington, Spirits)
Anthony Mackie, The Hurt Locker 1 win (African-American) 2 mentions (Online, Washington)
Paul Schneider, Bright Star 1 win (NSFC)
John Henshaw, Looking for Eric 1 win (British Indie)
Stanley Tucci, The Lovely Bones 8 mentions (Globes, SAGs, Chicago, Indiana, BFCA, St. Louis, Detroit, Washington)
Alfred Molina, An Education 4 mentions (BFCA, St. Louis, Satellites, Washington)
Matt Damon, Invictus - 3 mentions (Globes, SAGs, BFCA)
Christopher Plummer, The Last Station 3 mentions (Globes, SAGs, Spirits)
Peter Capaldi, In The Loop 3 mentions (LA, Online, Chicago)
Robert Duvall, The Road - 1 mention (St. Louis)
Jackie Earle Haley, Watchmen 1 mention (Online)
Timothy Spall, The Damned United 1 mention (Satellites)
James McAvoy, The Last Station 1 mention (Satellites)
Woody Harrelson, Zombieland mention (Detroit)
Jemaine Clement, Gentleman Broncos 1 mention (Spirits)
Raymond McKinnon, That Evening Sun 1 mention (Spirits)


Best Supporting Actress
Mo’Nique, Precious 18 wins (NY, LA, NSFC, Chicago, Phoenix, Florida, Las Vegas, Satellites, Dallas, Detroit, Utah, African-American, Boston, San Francisco, Indiana, Southeastern, NY Online, Washington) 6 mentions (SAGs, Online, Globes, BFCA, St. Louis, Spirits)
Anna Kendrick, Up in the Air 4 wins (NBR, Toronto, Houston, Austin) 12 mentions (Globes, Chicago, Online, NSFC, SAGs, BFCA, Utah, St. Louis, Southeastern, LA, Detroit, Washington)
Samantha Morton, The Messenger 1 win (San Diego) 5 mentions (BFCA, St. Louis, NSFC, Washington, Spirits)
Anne-Marie Duff, Nowhere Boy 1 win (British Indie)
Vera Farmiga, Up in the Air 9 mentions (Globes, SAGs, Chicago, BFCA, Online, Indiana, St. Louis, Detroit, Washington)
Julianne Moore, A Single Man 5 mentions (Globes, Chicago, BFCA, Online, Washington)
Penelope Cruz, Nine 3 mentions (SAGs, Globes, Satellites)
Mélanie Laurent, Inglourious Basterds 2 mentions (St. Louis, Detroit)
Marion Cotillard, Nine 2 mentions (BFCA, Detroit)
Diane Kruger, Inglourious Basterds 2 mentions (Online, SAGs)
Mozhan Marno, The Stony of Soraya M. 1 mention (Satellites)
Emily Blunt, Sunshine Cleaning 1 mention (Satellites)
Dina Korzun, Cold Souls 1 mention (Spirits)
Natalie Portman, Brothers 1 mention (Chicago)
Natalie Press, 50 Dead Men Walking 1 mention (Spirits)
Mia Wasikowska, That Evening Sun 1 mention (Spirits)

Best Screenplay
Up In The Air 11 wins (LA, NBR, Chicago, Toronto, Phoenix, Austin, Dallas, Houston, Southeastern, Indiana, Washington), 5 mentions (Globes, BFCA, Online, St. Louis, Satellites)
Inglourious Basterds 5 wins (San Francisco, NY Online, San Diego, Toronto, Washington), 7 mentions (Globes, BFCA, Online, NSFC, Chicago, Utah, St. Louis)
(500) Days of Summer 4 wins (Las Vegas, Florida, Satellites, Southeastern), 6 mentions (BFCA, St. Louis, Online, Utah, Washington, Spirits)
A Serious Man 3 wins (NSFC, NBR, Boston) 6 mentions (BFCA, London, Online, Washington, Chicago, Satellites)
Fantastic Mr. Fox - 3 wins (Utah, San Diego, San Francisco) 3 mentions (BFCA, Online, Southeastern)
The Hurt Locker 2 wins (Chicago, Austin) 7 mentions (Globes, BFCA, Satellites, Online, Southeastern, Washington)
In The Loop 2 wins (NY, British Indie) 4 mentions (LA, London, Online, Chicago)
Up 1 win (Phoenix) 5 mentions (BFCA, Online, Satellites, Chicago, Washington)
Precious 1 win (African-American) 3 mentions (BFCA, Satellites, Washington)
An Education 6 mentions (BFCA, Chicago, London, St. Louis, Satellites, Washington)
District 9 4 mentions (Globes, Online, BFCA, Satellites)
Where The Wild Things Are 3 mentions (Chicago, Online, Indiana)
Summer Hours 1 mention (NSFC)
A Prophet 1 mention (London)
The White Ribbon 1 mention (London)
Bright Star 1 mention (Satellites)
A Single Man - 1 mention (BFCA)
Julie & Julia 1 mention (Satellites)
The Road 1 mention (Washington)
The Blind Side 1 mention (Washington)
The Messenger 1 mention (Spirits)
The Vicious Kind 1 mention (Spirits)
It’s Complicated 1 menton (Globes)
Adventureland 1 mention (Spirits)
The Last Station 1 mention (Spirits)
The Informant! 1 mention (Chicago)
Away We Go 1 mention (Chicago)

Best Foreign Film
Sin Nombre 6 wins (Indiana, Florida, Austin, Dallas, Houston, Washington), 4 mentions (BFCA, Chicago, Utah, St. Louis)
Summer Hours 5 wins (NY, LA, NSFC, Southeastern, Boston) 3 mentions (Washington, Online, Chicago)
The White Ribbon 3 wins (Toronto, Chicago, NY Online ), 9 mentions (Globes, BFCA, Southeastern, Online, London, NBR, LA, Washington, Satellites)
Broken Embraces 2 wins (Phoenix, Satellites) 5 mentions (Globes, Online, BFCA, Chicago, Washington)
Red Cliff 1 win (Las Vegas) 5 mentions (BFCA, Chicago, St. Louis, Satellites, Washington)
The Maid 1 win (Satellites) 4 mentions (Globes, Spirits, NBR, St. Louis)
A Prophet 1 win (NBR) 3 mentions (Globes, London, Spirits)
Let The Right One In 1 win (British Indie) 1 mention (London)
You The Living 1 win (San Francisco)
Thirst 1 win (Utah)
Il Divo 1 win (San Diego)
Police, Adjective 2 mentions (NSFC, Online)
Coco Before Chanel 2 mentions (BFCA, St. Louis)
Everlasting Moments 2 mentions (NSFC, Spirits)
35 Shots of Rum 1 mention (NSFC)
Silent Light 1 mention (Online)
Treeless Mountain - 1 mention (St. Louis)
Winter In Wartime 1 mention (Satellites)
I Killed My Mother 1 mention (Satellites)
Revanche 1 mention (NBR)
Song Of Sparrows 1 mention (NBR)
Three Monkeys 1 mention (NBR)
Mother 1 mention (Spirits)
Welcome 1 mention (Indiana)
Baaria 1 mention (Globes)

Best Documentary
The Cove 11 wins (NBR, LA, Dallas, San Diego, Florida, Houston, Utah, Toronto, Boston, Indiana, NY Online) 7 mentions (BFCA, Chicago, Online, Southeastern, Washington, Cinema Eye, Satellites)
Anvil! The Story of Anvil 5 wins (San Francisco, Chicago, Las Vegas, Austin, IDA) 9 mentions (BFCA, NSFC, Utah, Online, Indiana, St. Louis, Washington, Spirits)
Food, Inc. 3 wins (Washington, Southeastern, Gothams) 8 mentions (BFCA, Chicago, Online, St. Louis, NBR, Spirits, Cinema Eye, IDA)
The Beaches of Agnes 2 wins (NSFC, LA) 2 mentions (Online, Satellites)
Capitalism: A Love Story 1 win (Phoenix) 5 mentions (BFCA, Online, Chicago, St. Louis, Washington)
Mugabe and the White African 1 win (British Indie) 1 mention (IDA)
Of Time and the City 1 win (NY)
Every Little Step 1 win (Satellites)
Good Hair 4 mentions (St. Louis, NBR, Washington, Gothams)
Tyson 4 mentions (St. Louis, NSFC, Chicago, Gothams)
Burma VJ: Reporting From A Closed Country 2 mentions (NBR, Cinema Eye)
October Country 2 mentions (Spirits, Cinema Eye)
Michael Jackson’s This Is It 1 mention (BFCA)
Crude 1 mention (NBR)
Diary of Times Square Thief 1 mention (IDA)
Afghan Star 1 mention (IDA)
The Most Dangerous Man In America 1 mention (NBR)
More Than a Game 1 mention (Spirits)
Which Way Home1 mention (Spirits)
Loot mention (Cinema Eye)
Paradise 1 mention (Gothams)
My Neighbour, My Killer 1 mention (Gothams)
It Might Get Loud 1 mention (Satellites)
The September Issue 1 mention (Satellites)
Valentino: The Last Emperor 1 mention (Satellites)


Best Animated Film
Up 11 wins (NBR, Boston, Chicago, Phoenix, Florida, NY Online, Houston, Dallas, Austin, Southeastern, Washington) 8 mentions (Globes, Online, Indiana, BFCA, Utah, St. Louis, LA, Satelllites)
Fantastic Mr. Fox 7 wins (NY, LA, Las Vegas, Satellites, Utah, Toronto, Indiana) 7 mentions (Globes, BFCA, Online, Chicago, Southeastern, St. Louis, Washington)
Coraline 1 win (San Francisco) 6 mentions (Globes, BFCA, Online, Chicago, St. Louis, Washington)
The Princess and the Frog 6 mentions (Globes, BFCA, Chicago, Online, St. Louis, Satellites)
Ponyo 4 mentions (St. Louis, Chicago, Online, Washington)
Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs 3 mentions (Globes, BFCA, Satellites)
9 1 mention (Washington)


Best Ensemble
The Hurt Locker 2 wins (Washington, Gothams) 1 mention (SAGs)
Inglourious Basterds 2 wins (Phoenix, San Diego) 3 mentions (SAGS, BFCA, Detroit)
Precious 1 win (Boston) 4 mentions (SAGs, BFCA, Detroit, Washington)
Star Trek 1 win (Boston) 3 mentions (BFCA, Detroit, Washington)
Nine 1 win (Satellites) 3 mentions (SAGs, BFCA, Washington)
A Serious Man 1 win (Spirits) 1 mention (Gothams)
It’s Complicated 1 win (NBR)
In The Loop 1 win (NY Online)
The Hangover 1 win (Detroit)
Up In The Air 2 mentions (BFCA, Washington)
An Education 1 mention (SAGs)
Zombieland 1 mention (Detroit)
Adventureland 1 mention (Gothams)
Cold Souls 1 mention (Gothams)
Sugar 1 mention (Gothams)


Breakthrough Performance
Gabourey Sidibe, Precious 6 wins (NBR, Phoenix, Florida, Satellites Washington, Detroit) 1 mention (Chicago)
Christian McKay, Me & Orson Welles 1 win (Austin) 3 mentions (Detroit, Washington, Chicago)
Carey Mulligan, An Education 1 win (Chicago) 2 mentions (Detroit, Washington)
Jeremy Renner, The Hurt Locker 1 win (NBR) 2 mentions (Washington, Gothams)
Christoph Waltz, Inglourious Basterds 1 win (New York Online) 1 mention (Detroit)
Katie Jarvis, Fish Tank 1 win (British Indie)
Catalina Saavedra, The Maid 1 win (Gothams)
Anna Kendrick, Up in the Air 2 mentions (Detroit, Washington)
Sharlto Copley, District 9 1 mention (Chicago)
Max Records, Where The Wild Things Are 1 mention (Chicago)
Chris Pine, Star Trek 1 mention (Detroit)
Ben Foster, The Messenger 1 mention (Gothams)
Souléymane Sy Savané, Goodbye Solo 1 mention (Gothams)
Patton Oswalt, Big Fan 1 mention (Gothams)


Reflexiones y análisis (en inglés) sobre "Avatar" (varios)


Attention: Spoilers Ahead

By Rob Beschizza

Avatar
doesn't have a bad story, but its unswerving direction does make it a predictable one. Since the internet's already hashed out the cultural angles of James Cameron's splendid epic, let's take a look at the storytelling mechanics--something he approached with a caution only $400M buys. What risks could Cameron have taken to add some surprise, without spiking the straightforward narrative?

Here's five ideas to get us started...

1. Jake actually betrays the Na'vi

Our hero's journey is smooth sailing: Jake so badly needs his destination that there's never much ambivalence about the journey. This lack of internal conflict manifests when the Na'vi tribe rejects him: his only betrayal of them is the plain fact of his original mission, which he'd had abandoned in any case. Wasn't it obvious that he might be telling others what he'd learned about the tribe? As the first "warrior" dreamwalker, no less.

If Jake instead pursued an explicit and timely opportunity to betray his new friends, his 'going native' afterward would have been a powerful moral turning point rather than a faint point on a 'character arc.'

2. Give his rival some balls

In Dune, off-worlder Paul Atreides is forced to kill to gain acceptance with the locals when his own kind finally forces him into the wilds. In Avatar, however, Jake only has to show up on a fancy ride. Instead of becoming a nonentity after their earlier aikido warmup, Na'vi chief-to-be Tsu-tey could have drawn a line in the moss: I represent the caution and tradition of my people, and you'll have to beat me down to change and lead us. If Jake has to defeat, even kill an ally who hates him, it tarnishes his character--but Pandora is red in tooth and claw, after all, and it is what he's fighting for.

3. The savages show how smart they are

Jake masters the bow and horse. Why not let one of the Na'vi surprise everyone by getting to grips with some of that weird sky-people tech? And perhaps even do a little betrayal of his or her own.

4. Show the colonel's hidden depths

You can't just let Steven Lang take a role like that and then bury him in cartoon villainy. Colonel Quaritch is evidently a spiritually blasted former soldier who went private-sector after tiring of fighting dirty wars. As Lang says in an interview, "I didn't play a villain; I played a man who is doing his job the best way that he can." But he isn't given much space for that nuance by the script. For example, he knows that his brief is to protect a blood diamond operation, not patriotic duty, and yet in his climactic battle with Jake, he asks him how he could betray his people. What he really means is, "How could you not be a soldier, son?"

In the movie, Jake simply snarls. A retort would be sweeter. "Is that what they told you when you quit Venezuela?" does the the trick. The Colonel knows he's lost, after all, and getting irony thrown in his face offers him a chance to choose his own doom--without any need for the leaden pathos that often comes with such turnarounds. Consider the many suggestions that Quaritch is the only human on Pandora to feel at home there in his own body--he is much more like the Na'vi than he'd like to admit.

5. Kill Carter Burke

That brings us to the disinterested corporate apparatchik in charge of the whole show. He's the real villain of the piece, who gives the natives none of the respect offered them by his soldiers and scientists, at least until his decisions' moral consequences are thrown in his face by Ripley.

Wait... wrong movie. In any case, Mr. Cameron had the right idea the first time around. Kill the slimeball--or better yet, let an alien do it.

....................................................................................................

By David Poland

After I read Monika Bartyzel's December 27th piece n Cinematical, 'Avatar' and the Death of Storytelling, my instinct was to explain in some detail why this was wrongheaded.

Four days and a third view of the film from start to finish later and I am less inclined to do so... because the argument Bartyzel makes is so lame and unsupportable by anything other than the hubristic urge to piss on what's popular, it is not worth my time or yours. Somehow, we are supposed to just buy the premise that the storytelling is weak... and discuss from there.

To give the author and those who wish to dance naked in the warm drool of the headline their due, the headline is more clear in its argument than the wandering, unfocused article. Bartyzel seems to suffer the child-journalist's difficulty (and I have no idea how old or experienced Bartyzel is... the name has never registered with me before) of confusing personal disappointment with the objective failure of others. Worse is the rhetorically moronic trope of "if they had only made an effort!" Oy.

To wit: "(How the frak can James Cameron have cooked this story up for a decade, waiting for technology to catch up with his vision, and not want the story to be killer?"

or

"What could Cameron have done? It seems all too simple -- workshop the script, get advice from trusted names, put similar effort into all aspects of the film."

Or, hey, he could have made Avatar into a blog and just pulled stuff out of his ass instead of making the movie.

Do I think that Cameron should have found someone he trusted who would have told him that some of the clinker lines in the film could have been smoothed down? Yes. But a half-dozen pieces of overly gung-ho dialogue is not "the end of storytelling."

If you actually look at Avatar clearly, thinking seriously about the storytelling, it is as complex as any film Charlie Kaufman has ever written. What it is not - and I think that this could be be and should be seriously considered by writers who chose to think about film seriously - is particularly oblique, as many of the films that "serious" critics choose to love are. But what's funny about that is that if you really start to think about what's been set up in Avatar, nature perhaps being hard-wired in a literal way, Cameron is throwing out as big an idea as any studio film has offered in years.

Avatar is a genre movie. Absolutely. And when it isn't thrilling the audience, it is usually reaching for emotion, not intellect. But it is also a master class in story structure. The weakest parts of the first act - all the Basil Exposition moments - are all paid off in a big way in the third act.

I defy any of the bashers to come up with a major element of the movie that doesn't actually make sense in the context of the movie. I'm sure there are a few minor ones... there always seem to be a few, even in the most highly regarded films. But this is not Charlie's Angels: Full Frontal or Bad Boys II or even Transformers, #1 or #2, randomly inserting action sequences that never quite fit the context of what minor story that is being offered.

What Avatar is not is as dark and mysterious as The Dark Knight. There is no evil character as strong as The Joker. Our hero and heroine are not as brooding and focused as The Batman. And the moral questions of Avatar are not as clearly stated or as yes/no as The Dark Knight. But all that said, the story structure of the movie is more successful than TDK at delivering on what it promises.

Everyone and anyone should be welcome to prefer one kind of discussion of ideas at the movies over another. I am in no way suggesting that Bartyzel or anyone else needs to bow to Avatar, either for commercial or aesthetic reasons. (And the "we are the rebels under attack by big bad money" shtick from the bashers is unrelenting.) But attack what you really don't like. Please don't feel compelled to so grossly overreach as to attack a complex and working structure - the columns holding the visuals up - in order to try to bring down the whole thing.

Avatar delivers more, I would argue, than people realize, not because the storytelling is weak, but because audiences - however smart - have a hard time seeing the story for the digital trees.

SPOILERS

Let's just take a part of the third act of the film.

At the start of the act, the humans who have taken the side of the Na'Vi against industry, the military, and indeed, even humans in general, move forward without discussion and without a plan. They have changed sides 100% and behave as a native would instinctively. They need to get out of the enemy's stronghold and to get back to what is now their home.

What makes this interesting and complex is that just one scene before, this group was still working with the other humans to try to mediate. Without dialogue explaining this, the audience understands what's happened. And the first thing this band of New Na'Vis does when free, also without explanation, is to take - as best they can - control of their avatars into their own hands and away from the belligerent humans.

Once they make this transition, Cameron flips the entire movie. Jakesully finds a way to become a leader again and brings the military insight that if united, the indigenous population could fight off the intruders. (Ironically, to my argument, the existence of other tribes isn't introduced until this scene... one loose thread.) Suddenly, the Sky People are on the defensive... suddenly they are rationalizing not that they have a mission and hate those in their way, but that if they don't attack first, they will be destroyed by those "blue monkeys," who are organizing only because the Sky People trying to annihilate them.

Cameron then flips the movie again, introducing the concept of a nuclear weapon, with the threat to bomb out the second most important place for the Na'Vi (the white tree).

And Cameron flips the movie one more time with the arrival of nature to defend itself.


END SPOILERS

This represents four major power shifts in the third act alone. None of it is casual, random, or even confusing. It is clear to the audience without being spelled out. They feel it. And that is a real achievement in story telling.

Again... I am not saying that the film is flawless. I am not saying that box office gross = quality or social importance or anything else. All I am saying is that the movie is hitting people in a real way and to try to take that away by claiming, without a real argument, that it's "just visuals" is irresponsible and dumb.

Those of us who write fot public consumption about movies always have a choice. We can try to figure out what is going on with audiences when they latch onto a particular film. Or we can judge them as we judge the movie and try to argue why those stupid people have been suckered into thinking they are enjoying themselves. I guess there is a third choice... bowing to whatever is commercial... quote whoring on whatever level. And I often think the "I'm so much smarter than them" arguments are a response to those quote whore types... and completely forget that real people find real enjoyment in these films and there may be a reason that we have not yet considered.

I have no idea how anyone can stand the Twilight movies or the Sex & The City movie... but they don't only pay to see these films... they LOVE them. I got it a little more on Mamma Mia!. And I still feel fine about saying these films SUCK without having to demean those who love them. Yes, me saying it will anger and/or embarrass some who love them. But that's just the gig.

What is NOT the gig is arguing that Twilight is the end of cinematography or that Sex & The City was the end of feminism or that Mamma Mia! is the end of singing by male leads or, for that matter, Meryl Streep acting without mugging.

Heck... if you aren't intellectually curious, that's okay too. Maybe that's your niche! If it is, please disregard all I just wrote. So sorry to get in the way of your malevolent fun.

.................................................................................................................

By Monika Bartyzel

As people gush about Avatar, allowing the beauty to make up for a storyline that seems to leave most fans disappointed, I wonder: By buying into this whole love-the-pretty-visuals bend, are we helping to end the art of storytelling? Actions have a reaction. Money talks. Merge those two together and it seems like we're sending a loud and clear message to Hollywood that we don't care if the story sucks as long as everything looks pretty. It would certainly account for the neverending barrage of crappy, big-visuals, big-action features.

Of course, it's not so easy to just ignore a film like Avatar. It's been buzzed about for eons. It has infiltrated television shows and plastered its message near and far. We've got to see it. The curiosity is too high. At the same time, however, how the frak can James Cameron have cooked this story up for a decade, waiting for technology to catch up with his vision, and not want the story to be killer? How can he not at least work that script into a form that can at least begin to rival the visuals it's matched with? It seems like an insult. Sure, as Todd Gilchrist pointed out, the man isn't known for his stories. But they usually don't have the push, the marketing, and the time that this one did. While waiting for that technology to meet your needs, why not get some trusted opinions and hone the script? Make each word, each moment, and each scene parallel the beauty of Cameron's cinematic eye -- imagine what the film would've been then.

The production budget was enormous. It was a project that took a decade to complete. If we can't expect 10 years to bring us solid storytelling, one of the most basic essences of cinema, that doesn't bode so well for Hollywood's cinematic future. Long-gestating projects are a different cinematic beast than something like Transformers, which got a sequel quickly to capitalize on the box office, which was meant to be nothing but goofy spectacle. At least those popcorn flicks have the excuse of speed and fluff.

What could Cameron have done? It seems all too simple -- workshop the script, get advice from trusted names, put similar effort into all aspects of the film. But there's also the cinematic world at large to consider. Do you think we're approaching the death of storytelling, and how can we avoid it or fix the problem? Must we rob ourselves the pleasure of beautiful films in protest? Thoughts?